Skip to content
Compare VPS vs Jaro

VPS vs Jaro Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare VPS vs Jaro: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

VPS VPS Home Team
Jaro Jaro Away Team
VPS
51.8
W L W L L L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Jaro
30.8
L L L L W D W L D L

Performance Radar

VPS
Jaro

Categories Won

10

VPS

4

Draw

1

Jaro

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 1D, 4L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

-12

-12

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Lindholm (4 goals)
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

48.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.51

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.29

0.68

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
51.8

Attack: 57.5, Defense: 57.5, Form: 47.9

30.8

Attack: 26.2, Defense: 32.7, Form: 19.6

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1

16-30'

2
5

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

1
4

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

VPS
Jaro
VPS

Power Rating Breakdown

51.8

Overall

Attack 57.5
Defense 57.5
Form 47.9
Consistency 38.8
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

30.8

Overall

Attack 26.2
Defense 32.7
Form 19.6
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.3 vs 50.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
VPS logo VPS
W
Ilves (49%)
L
TPS (50%)
W
Jaro (38%)
L
Inter Turku (53%)
L
KuPS (48%)
L
HJK (60%)
W
SJK (40%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
Jaro logo Jaro
L
Oulu (38%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
VPS (50%)
L
Lahti (59%)
W
SJK (40%)
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
Ilves (44%)
L
TPS (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves A
1 - 0 W
49%
TPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Jaro A
3 - 1 W
38%
Inter Turku H
0 - 1 L
53%
KuPS A
1 - 3 L
48%
HJK A
1 - 2 L
60%
SJK H
1 - 0 W
40%
Mariehamn H
4 - 0 W
29%
Gnistan A
1 - 1 D
58%
Oulu H
5 - 1 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oulu H
0 - 1 L
38%
HJK A
0 - 3 L
60%
VPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Lahti A
0 - 2 L
59%
SJK H
2 - 1 W
40%
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
44%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
54%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
54%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
49%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.8 vs 48.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Few sides can match VPS in front of goal. Their 1.8 average per fixture tells the story, with S. Lindholm driving that output personally responsible for 4 goals this campaign.

VPS holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.2 goals per game and recording 3 clean sheets, compared to Jaro's leaky backline that surrenders 2.0 goals per match.

VPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: VPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Jaro is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. VPS is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Jaro shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 21.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for VPS. In practical terms, VPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

VPS emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (51.8 vs 30.8) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-08-08), VPS prevailed 1-3 against Jaro. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, VPS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Jaro shows genuine quality and mental strength. Jaro will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. VPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

VPS

VPS

VS
Jaro

Jaro

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

VPS

5W 1D 4L · 18 goals scored · 12 conceded

Jaro

2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or