Skip to content
Compare VPS vs SJK

VPS vs SJK Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare VPS vs SJK: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

VPS VPS Home Team
SJK SJK Away Team
VPS
51.8
W L W L L L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

SJK
39.9
L L D W L L L W D D

Performance Radar

VPS
SJK

Categories Won

10

VPS

4

Draw

1

SJK

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 1D, 4L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Lindholm (4 goals)
Kelwin (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

47.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.51

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.29

1.26

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
51.8

Attack: 57.5, Defense: 57.5, Form: 47.9

39.9

Attack: 42.2, Defense: 48.7, Form: 19.5

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

5

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

3
4

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
VPS
SJK
VPS

Power Rating Breakdown

51.8

Overall

Attack 57.5
Defense 57.5
Form 47.9
Consistency 38.8
SJK

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 42.2
Defense 48.7
Form 19.5
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.3 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
VPS logo VPS
W
Ilves (49%)
L
TPS (50%)
W
Jaro (38%)
L
Inter Turku (53%)
L
KuPS (48%)
L
HJK (60%)
W
SJK (40%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
SJK logo SJK
L
Lahti (54%)
L
Mariehamn (34%)
D
Gnistan (54%)
W
HJK (55%)
L
Jaro (38%)
L
KuPS (43%)
L
VPS (55%)
W
TPS (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves A
1 - 0 W
49%
TPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Jaro A
3 - 1 W
38%
Inter Turku H
0 - 1 L
53%
KuPS A
1 - 3 L
48%
HJK A
1 - 2 L
60%
SJK H
1 - 0 W
40%
Mariehamn H
4 - 0 W
29%
Gnistan A
1 - 1 D
58%
Oulu H
5 - 1 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lahti H
1 - 2 L
54%
Mariehamn A
0 - 2 L
34%
Gnistan H
2 - 2 D
54%
HJK H
3 - 0 W
55%
Jaro A
1 - 2 L
38%
KuPS H
0 - 2 L
43%
VPS A
0 - 1 L
55%
TPS H
3 - 1 W
50%
Ilves A
2 - 2 D
49%
Inter Turku A
1 - 1 D
58%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 45.8 vs 47.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Offensively, VPS outperforms SJK with 1.8 goals per match to 1.3, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

VPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to SJK's 1.5.

VPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

SJK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: VPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: SJK is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. VPS is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while SJK shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 80% win probability for VPS. In practical terms, VPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

VPS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.9-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-07-10), VPS prevailed 1-0 against SJK. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. VPS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. SJK will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. VPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

VPS

VPS

VS
SJK

SJK

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

VPS

5W 1D 4L · 18 goals scored · 12 conceded

SJK

2W 3D 5L · 13 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or