Skip to content
Compare Wales vs Kazakhstan

Wales vs Kazakhstan Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Wales vs Kazakhstan: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Wales Wales Home Team
Kazakhstan Kazakhstan Away Team
Wales
47.0
L D D D W W L L L W

Last 10 Matches

Kazakhstan
42.9
L D W W L D D W L L

Performance Radar

Wales
Kazakhstan

Categories Won

8

Wales

4

Draw

3

Kazakhstan

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
H. Wilson (3 goals)
G. Kenzhebek (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.5

League Difficulty: 82.5, Opponent Quality: 61.4

54.7

League Difficulty: 82.5, Opponent Quality: 62.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.79

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.29

1.31

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
47.0

Attack: 52.2, Defense: 55.7, Form: 31.3

42.9

Attack: 38.4, Defense: 55.8, Form: 31.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
3

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

3

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

4

76-90+'

2
Wales
Kazakhstan
Wales

Power Rating Breakdown

47.0

Overall

Attack 52.2
Defense 55.7
Form 31.3
Consistency 53.2
Kazakhstan

Power Rating Breakdown

42.9

Overall

Attack 38.4
Defense 55.8
Form 31.4
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

82.5 vs 82.5

Opponent Quality

61.4 vs 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Wales logo Wales
L
Romania (65%)
D
Ghana (44%)
D
N. Ireland (57%)
D
Bosnia (62%)
W
N. Macedonia (52%)
W
Liechtenstein (42%)
L
Belgium (79%)
L
England (83%)
Kazakhstan logo Kazakhstan
L
Hungary (72%)
D
Armenia (48%)
W
Comoros (58%)
W
Namibia (50%)
L
Faroe Islands (74%)
D
Belgium (79%)
D
N. Macedonia (57%)
W
Liechtenstein (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Romania A
1 - 2 L
65%
Ghana H
1 - 1 D
44%
N. Ireland H
1 - 1 D
57%
Bosnia H
1 - 1 D
62%
N. Macedonia H
7 - 1 W
52%
Liechtenstein A
1 - 0 W
42%
Belgium H
2 - 4 L
79%
England A
0 - 3 L
83%
Canada H
0 - 1 L
66%
Kazakhstan A
1 - 0 W
64%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hungary A
1 - 3 L
72%
Armenia A
1 - 1 D
48%
Comoros H
1 - 0 W
58%
Namibia H
2 - 0 W
50%
Faroe Islands A
0 - 1 L
74%
Belgium H
1 - 1 D
79%
N. Macedonia A
1 - 1 D
57%
Liechtenstein H
4 - 0 W
38%
Belgium A
0 - 6 L
84%
Wales H
0 - 1 L
60%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 54.5 vs 54.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Wales leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.5 goals per game compared to Kazakhstan's 1.1 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Wales giving up 1.4 and Kazakhstan giving up 1.4 per fixture.

Kazakhstan has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Statistical modeling projects 2.7 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Wales faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Kazakhstan can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: Kazakhstan's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

These two teams met recently in the FIFA World Cup Qualifying - European (2025-09-04): Wales defeated Kazakhstan 0-1. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates Wales's ability to perform on the biggest stage against Kazakhstan. Notably, Wales achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Kazakhstan shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 0-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Kazakhstan will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Wales will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Wales

Wales

VS
Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Wales

3W 3D 4L · 15 goals scored · 14 conceded

Kazakhstan

3W 3D 4L · 11 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or