Skip to content
Compare Walsall vs Cambridge U

Walsall vs Cambridge U Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Walsall vs Cambridge U: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Walsall Walsall Home Team
Cambridge U Cambridge U Away Team
Walsall
34.4
D W W D L L L L W L

Last 10 Matches

Cambridge U
50.1
D W W D D W D W L D

Performance Radar

Walsall
Cambridge U

Categories Won

2

Walsall

2

Draw

11

Cambridge U

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Hancock (2 goals)
B. Knight (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.2

League Difficulty: 42.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7

44.4

League Difficulty: 43.0, Opponent Quality: 45.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.73

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.07

1.06

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
34.4

Attack: 25.1, Defense: 44.0, Form: 28.3

50.1

Attack: 34.6, Defense: 75.5, Form: 37.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

1

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

Walsall
Cambridge U
Walsall

Power Rating Breakdown

34.4

Overall

Attack 25.1
Defense 44.0
Form 28.3
Consistency 49.3
Cambridge U

Power Rating Breakdown

50.1

Overall

Attack 34.6
Defense 75.5
Form 37.8
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

42.0 vs 43.0

Opponent Quality

45.7 vs 45.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Walsall logo Walsall
D
Grimsby (51%)
W
Gillingham (43%)
W
Bristol C (47%)
D
Notts Co (46%)
L
Telford (42%)
L
A Villa (42%)
L
Bromley (46%)
L
Harrogate (59%)
Cambridge U logo Cambridge U
D
Bromley (48%)
W
Wigan (36%)
W
Barnet (56%)
D
Norwich (50%)
D
Northampton (39%)
W
Preston (39%)
D
Crewe (51%)
W
Barrow (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Grimsby H
0 - 0 D
51%
Gillingham A
3 - 0 W
43%
Bristol C A
1 - 0 W
47%
Notts Co H
0 - 0 D
46%
Telford A
0 - 1 L
42%
A Villa H
0 - 5 L
42%
Bromley A
1 - 3 L
46%
Harrogate H
0 - 2 L
59%
Barrow A
3 - 1 W
43%
Cheltenham H
0 - 4 L
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Bromley A
1 - 1 D
48%
Wigan H
3 - 2 W
36%
Barnet H
2 - 1 W
56%
Norwich A
0 - 0 D
50%
Northampton H
0 - 0 D
39%
Preston A
1 - 0 W
39%
Crewe A
0 - 0 D
51%
Barrow H
3 - 0 W
38%
Grimsby H
1 - 2 L
51%
Bromley A
0 - 0 D
46%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 44.2 vs 44.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Cambridge U leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.1 goals per game compared to Walsall's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Cambridge U — 0.6 goals conceded per game and 6 clean sheets put them well ahead of Walsall, who give up 1.6 goals per match at the other end.

Walsall has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cambridge U has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Walsall is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.1 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Cambridge U has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 15.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Cambridge U. In practical terms, Cambridge U would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Cambridge U emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (50.1 vs 34.4) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Walsall

Walsall

VS
Cambridge U

Cambridge U

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Walsall

3W 2D 5L · 8 goals scored · 16 conceded

Cambridge U

4W 5D 1L · 11 goals scored · 6 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or