Walsall vs Cambridge U Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Walsall vs Cambridge U: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Walsall
Home Team
Cambridge U
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Walsall
Draw
Cambridge U
Statistical Comparison
3W, 2D, 5L
4W, 5D, 1L
8 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
-8
+5
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
0W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 42.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7
League Difficulty: 43.0, Opponent Quality: 45.4
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.07
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.04
Attack: 25.1, Defense: 44.0, Form: 28.3
Attack: 34.6, Defense: 75.5, Form: 37.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Walsall
Cambridge U
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 44.2 vs 44.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Cambridge U leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.1 goals per game compared to Walsall's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Cambridge U — 0.6 goals conceded per game and 6 clean sheets put them well ahead of Walsall, who give up 1.6 goals per match at the other end.
Walsall has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Cambridge U has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Walsall is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.1 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Cambridge U has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 15.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Cambridge U. In practical terms, Cambridge U would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Cambridge U emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (50.1 vs 34.4) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Walsall
Cambridge U
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Walsall
3W 2D 5L · 8 goals scored · 16 conceded
Cambridge U
4W 5D 1L · 11 goals scored · 6 conceded
Popular Teams