Skip to content
Compare Wealdstone vs Aldershot

Wealdstone vs Aldershot Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Wealdstone vs Aldershot: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Wealdstone Wealdstone Home Team
Aldershot Aldershot Away Team
Wealdstone
40.1
W L W D L D D L W L

Last 10 Matches

Aldershot
34.8
W L W W L L L L L D

Performance Radar

Wealdstone
Aldershot

Categories Won

9

Wealdstone

3

Draw

3

Aldershot

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
O. Olomola (2 goals)
R. Hill (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

29%

2W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
43.9

League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 47.1

40.9

League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 42.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.95

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.15

0.98

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
40.1

Attack: 34.4, Defense: 53.2, Form: 28.2

34.8

Attack: 30.3, Defense: 42.4, Form: 27.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2

46-60'

1

61-75'

3

76-90+'

1
Wealdstone
Aldershot
Wealdstone

Power Rating Breakdown

40.1

Overall

Attack 34.4
Defense 53.2
Form 28.2
Consistency 53.2
Aldershot

Power Rating Breakdown

34.8

Overall

Attack 30.3
Defense 42.4
Form 27.3
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

39.0 vs 39.0

Opponent Quality

47.1 vs 42.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Wealdstone logo Wealdstone
W
MK Dons (44%)
L
Chertsey (49%)
W
Hemel H (46%)
D
Southend (52%)
L
Southend (48%)
D
Scunthorpe (38%)
D
Boston (48%)
L
Rochdale (48%)
Aldershot logo Aldershot
W
Hanwell (41%)
L
Oxford U (47%)
W
Farnborough (49%)
W
Portsmouth (49%)
L
Truro (41%)
L
Brackley (34%)
L
Southend (43%)
L
Gateshead (42%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
MK Dons H
2 - 0 W
44%
Chertsey A
0 - 2 L
49%
Hemel H H
1 - 0 W
46%
Southend A
0 - 0 D
52%
Southend A
1 - 2 L
48%
Scunthorpe H
1 - 1 D
38%
Boston H
1 - 1 D
48%
Rochdale A
1 - 2 L
48%
Aldershot H
3 - 0 W
33%
Boreham Wood A
1 - 5 L
65%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hanwell A
2 - 0 W
41%
Oxford U H
1 - 3 L
47%
Farnborough H
2 - 1 W
49%
Portsmouth H
2 - 0 W
49%
Truro H
0 - 2 L
41%
Brackley A
1 - 2 L
34%
Southend H
0 - 2 L
43%
Gateshead H
0 - 1 L
42%
Wealdstone A
0 - 3 L
44%
Sutton H
2 - 2 D
32%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 43.9 vs 40.9), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

The attacking output of Wealdstone and Aldershot is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.1 and 1.0 goals per game respectively.

Wealdstone's backline outperforms Aldershot's, with 1.3 goals conceded per match versus 1.6.

Wealdstone has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Aldershot has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 63% win probability for Wealdstone. In practical terms, Wealdstone would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Wealdstone, with a 5.3-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent National League match (2026-04-06), Wealdstone prevailed 3-0 against Aldershot. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Wealdstone secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Wealdstone completely dominated Aldershot in that encounter, raising serious questions about Aldershot's ability to compete at this level. Aldershot will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Wealdstone will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Wealdstone

Wealdstone

VS
Aldershot

Aldershot

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Wealdstone

3W 3D 4L · 11 goals scored · 13 conceded

Aldershot

3W 1D 6L · 10 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or