Skip to content
Compare Wolfsburg vs Augsburg

Wolfsburg vs Augsburg Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Wolfsburg vs Augsburg: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Wolfsburg Wolfsburg Home Team
Augsburg Augsburg Away Team
Wolfsburg
47.4
W L D W L D D W L L

Last 10 Matches

Augsburg
48.6
D L W W D W D D L L

Performance Radar

Wolfsburg
Augsburg

Categories Won

3

Wolfsburg

6

Draw

6

Augsburg

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
D. Pejčinović (4 goals)
A. Kade (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
58.5

League Difficulty: 86.4, Opponent Quality: 68.3

70.4

League Difficulty: 86.4, Opponent Quality: 66.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.64

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.24

1.93

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.43

Adjusted Power Rating
47.4

Attack: 50.6, Defense: 57.9, Form: 32.5

48.6

Attack: 60.2, Defense: 44.1, Form: 36.1

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

1
Wolfsburg
Augsburg
Wolfsburg

Power Rating Breakdown

47.4

Overall

Attack 50.6
Defense 57.9
Form 32.5
Consistency 53.2
Augsburg

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 60.2
Defense 44.1
Form 36.1
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.4 vs 86.4

Opponent Quality

68.3 vs 66.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
Wolfsburg logo Wolfsburg
W
Verl (48%)
L
Paderborn (84%)
D
Paderborn (82%)
W
St. Pauli (52%)
L
Bayern Munich (77%)
D
Freiburg (66%)
D
M'gladbach (72%)
W
Union Berlin (62%)
Augsburg logo Augsburg
D
Saarbrücken (45%)
L
Union Berlin (62%)
W
M'gladbach (72%)
W
Bremen (68%)
D
Frankfurt (65%)
W
Bayer 04 (75%)
D
Hoffenheim (64%)
D
Hamburger (63%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verl H
3 - 0 W
48%
Paderborn A
1 - 2 L
84%
Paderborn H
0 - 0 D
82%
St. Pauli A
3 - 1 W
52%
Bayern Munich H
0 - 1 L
77%
Freiburg A
1 - 1 D
66%
M'gladbach H
0 - 0 D
72%
Union Berlin A
2 - 1 W
62%
Frankfurt H
1 - 2 L
65%
Bayer 04 A
3 - 6 L
75%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Saarbrücken H
1 - 1 D
45%
Union Berlin A
0 - 4 L
62%
M'gladbach H
3 - 1 W
72%
Bremen A
3 - 1 W
68%
Frankfurt H
1 - 1 D
65%
Bayer 04 A
2 - 1 W
75%
Hoffenheim H
2 - 2 D
64%
Hamburger A
1 - 1 D
63%
Stuttgart H
2 - 5 L
76%
Dortmund A
0 - 2 L
76%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

Context matters here: Augsburg's schedule strength (SoS: 70.4) has been notably more demanding than Wolfsburg's (SoS: 58.5), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

The attacking output of Wolfsburg and Augsburg is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.4 and 1.5 goals per game respectively.

Defensively, Wolfsburg holds the advantage — allowing just 1.4 goals per game against Augsburg's 1.9.

Wolfsburg has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Augsburg has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.

Statistical modeling projects 3.1 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Augsburg's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by small margins on the day.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Wolfsburg

Wolfsburg

VS
Augsburg

Augsburg

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Wolfsburg

3W 3D 4L · 14 goals scored · 14 conceded

Augsburg

3W 4D 3L · 15 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or