Skip to content
Compare Worthing vs Enfield T

Worthing vs Enfield T Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Worthing vs Enfield T: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Worthing Worthing Home Team
Enfield T Enfield T Away Team
Worthing
59.4
D D W L W W W D W W

Last 10 Matches

Enfield T
36.0
D L W L D L L D W L

Performance Radar

Worthing
Enfield T

Categories Won

13

Worthing

2

Draw

0

Enfield T

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 3D, 1L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+12

+12

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
W. Makowski (4 goals)
S. Youngs (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 17
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
100%

3W / 3 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
43%

3W / 7 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
38.3

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 41.9

37.4

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 41.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.81

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: +0.49

0.94

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.36

Adjusted Power Rating
59.4

Attack: 67.7, Defense: 55.9, Form: 53.0

36.0

Attack: 37.9, Defense: 40.8, Form: 17.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

2
6

61-75'

2
6

76-90+'

4
Worthing
Enfield T
Worthing

Power Rating Breakdown

59.4

Overall

Attack 67.7
Defense 55.9
Form 53.0
Consistency 61.3
Enfield T

Power Rating Breakdown

36.0

Overall

Attack 37.9
Defense 40.8
Form 17.5
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

33.0 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

41.9 vs 41.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Worthing logo Worthing
D
Enfield T (44%)
D
Frome (46%)
W
Ebbsfleet (43%)
L
Maidstone (62%)
W
Dag & Red (40%)
W
Dorking (39%)
W
Eastbourne (24%)
D
Enfield T (38%)
Enfield T logo Enfield T
D
Worthing (60%)
L
Hampton & RB (44%)
W
Slough (21%)
L
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
D
Hemel H (40%)
L
Chelmsford (45%)
L
Chesham (43%)
D
Worthing (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Enfield T A
1 - 1 D
44%
Frome A
1 - 1 D
46%
Ebbsfleet H
2 - 0 W
43%
Maidstone A
1 - 2 L
62%
Dag & Red H
7 - 2 W
40%
Dorking A
2 - 1 W
39%
Eastbourne H
2 - 1 W
24%
Enfield T A
1 - 1 D
38%
Weston-s-Mare A
3 - 2 W
40%
Totton A
3 - 0 W
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Worthing H
1 - 1 D
60%
Hampton & RB A
0 - 1 L
44%
Slough H
5 - 2 W
21%
Weston-s-Mare A
0 - 1 L
40%
Hemel H H
0 - 0 D
40%
Chelmsford A
0 - 3 L
45%
Chesham H
3 - 4 L
43%
Worthing H
1 - 1 D
54%
Dover H
3 - 1 W
20%
Salisbury A
0 - 2 L
46%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 38.3 vs 37.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Worthing holds the attacking edge with 2.3 goals per match versus Enfield T's 1.3, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Worthing's backline outperforms Enfield T's, with 1.1 goals conceded per match versus 1.6.

Worthing has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Enfield T has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Worthing has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Worthing has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.1 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Enfield T is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Worthing is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Enfield T shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 23.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Worthing. In practical terms, Worthing would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Worthing holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 59.4 against 36.0 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 1-1 in the Club Friendlies (2026-07-24). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. These two teams drew 1-1 in the National League N / S (2026-03-28). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Worthing

Worthing

VS
Enfield T

Enfield T

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Worthing

6W 3D 1L · 23 goals scored · 11 conceded

Enfield T

2W 3D 5L · 13 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or