York vs Clitheroe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare York vs Clitheroe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
York
Home Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
York
Draw
Clitheroe
Statistical Comparison
5W, 2D, 3L
0W, 2D, 1L
15 / 10 matches
3 / 3 matches
16 / 10 matches
5 / 3 matches
-1
-2
4 / 10 matches
0 / 3 matches
6 / 10 matches
1 / 3 matches
6 / 10 matches
3 / 3 matches
3W / 5 matches
0W / 1 matches
2W / 5 matches
0W / 2 matches
League Difficulty: 38.0, Opponent Quality: 45.0
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 45.0
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.12
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.07
Attack: 46.1, Defense: 43.0, Form: 46.1
Attack: 31.7, Defense: 41.2, Form: 0.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
York
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (42.2 vs 45.0), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Offensively, York outperforms Clitheroe with 1.5 goals per match to 1.0, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Both defenses are comparable, with York conceding 1.6 and Clitheroe conceding 1.7 per match.
York has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Clitheroe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: York has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Clitheroe is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 3 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. York is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Clitheroe shows signs of decline with 0W in last 3.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, York faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.6 goals per match. If Clitheroe can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 11.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 79% win probability for York. In practical terms, York would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
York has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.5-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
In their recent English FA Trophy match (2025-12-13), Clitheroe prevailed 1-1 against York. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Clitheroe secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. York will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Clitheroe will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
York
Clitheroe
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
York
5W 2D 3L · 15 goals scored · 16 conceded
Clitheroe
0W 2D 1L · 3 goals scored · 5 conceded
Popular Teams