Železničar P vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Železničar P vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Železničar P
Home Team
Thun
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Železničar P
Draw
Thun
Statistical Comparison
3W, 5D, 2L
3W, 1D, 6L
14 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
+3
-5
4 / 10 matches
0 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.9
League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 52.1
0W / 0 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.07
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.12
Attack: 48.1, Defense: 65.3, Form: 30.9
Attack: 47.3, Defense: 26.6, Form: 26.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Železničar P
Thun
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.
Železničar P has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.1) compared to Thun (SoS: 38.6). This means Železničar P's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Železničar P averaging 1.4 and Thun averaging 1.6 goals per match.
Defensively, Železničar P is far superior, conceding just 1.1 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while Thun leaks 2.1 per match.
Železničar P has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.
Železničar P has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Železničar P
Thun
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Železničar P
3W 5D 2L · 14 goals scored · 11 conceded
Thun
3W 1D 6L · 16 goals scored · 21 conceded
Popular Teams