Zimbabwe vs Burkina Faso Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Zimbabwe vs Burkina Faso: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Zimbabwe
Home Team
Burkina Faso
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Zimbabwe
Draw
Burkina Faso
Statistical Comparison
4W, 1D, 5L
5W, 2D, 3L
12 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
-1
+5
3 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
2W / 3 matches
3W / 4 matches
2W / 7 matches
2W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 67.5, Opponent Quality: 54.7
League Difficulty: 66.0, Opponent Quality: 54.3
0W / 2 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.02
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.13
Attack: 38.4, Defense: 54.5, Form: 38.4
Attack: 57.2, Defense: 54.1, Form: 47.7
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Zimbabwe
Burkina Faso
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (46.1 vs 45.4), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Burkina Faso leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to Zimbabwe's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Both defenses are comparable, with Zimbabwe conceding 1.3 and Burkina Faso conceding 1.3 per match.
Burkina Faso has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
📈 Form Momentum: Burkina Faso has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Burkina Faso faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Zimbabwe can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 9.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 73% win probability for Burkina Faso. In practical terms, Burkina Faso would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
Burkina Faso has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.3-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Zimbabwe
Burkina Faso
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Zimbabwe
4W 1D 5L · 12 goals scored · 13 conceded
Burkina Faso
5W 2D 3L · 18 goals scored · 13 conceded
Popular Teams