Skip to content
Compare ZW vs Kryvbas KR

ZW vs Kryvbas KR Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare ZW vs Kryvbas KR: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

ZW ZW Home Team
Kryvbas KR Kryvbas KR Away Team
ZW
59.7
W W W W W D W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Kryvbas KR
61.5
D L W W D L W W L W

Performance Radar

ZW
Kryvbas KR

Categories Won

6

ZW

2

Draw

7

Kryvbas KR

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 1D, 3L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Opoku (5 goals)
G. Mendoza (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 13 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.6

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 49.4

68.3

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 65.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

2.96

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.76

Adjusted Power Rating
59.7

Attack: 59.3, Defense: 66.2, Form: 62.8

61.5

Attack: 86.8, Defense: 43.4, Form: 59.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
2

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

4
5

61-75'

4
3

76-90+'

3
ZW
Kryvbas KR
ZW

Power Rating Breakdown

59.7

Overall

Attack 59.3
Defense 66.2
Form 62.8
Consistency 43.3
Kryvbas KR

Power Rating Breakdown

61.5

Overall

Attack 86.8
Defense 43.4
Form 59.1
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

49.4 vs 65.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 25%
ZW logo ZW
W
Dender (32%)
W
Cercle Brugge (51%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
W
La Louvière (42%)
W
Dender (49%)
D
Cercle Brugge (58%)
W
Charleroi (63%)
L
Gent (51%)
Kryvbas KR logo Kryvbas KR
D
Oleksandria (57%)
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
W
Veres Rivne (64%)
W
Karpaty Lviv (77%)
D
SK Poltava (54%)
L
Dynamo Kyiv (77%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (45%)
W
Kudrivka (60%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dender H
2 - 1 W
32%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 2 W
51%
La Louvière H
4 - 0 W
38%
La Louvière A
2 - 0 W
42%
Dender A
2 - 1 W
49%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
58%
Charleroi H
1 - 0 W
63%
Gent A
0 - 2 L
51%
Standard H
0 - 1 L
64%
Mechelen A
1 - 2 L
46%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oleksandria A
1 - 1 D
57%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 3 L
78%
Veres Rivne A
3 - 1 W
64%
Karpaty Lviv H
1 - 0 W
77%
SK Poltava A
3 - 3 D
54%
Dynamo Kyiv H
5 - 6 L
77%
Rukh Vynnyky H
3 - 0 W
45%
Kudrivka A
2 - 1 W
60%
LNZ Cherkasy H
0 - 3 L
73%
Epitsentr H
2 - 1 W
67%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Kryvbas KR has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 68.3) compared to ZW (SoS: 54.6). This means Kryvbas KR's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Kryvbas KR holds the attacking edge with 2.2 goals per match versus ZW's 1.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

ZW has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Kryvbas KR's 1.9.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Kryvbas KR has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

ZW

ZW

VS
Kryvbas KR

Kryvbas KR

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

ZW

6W 1D 3L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded

Kryvbas KR

5W 2D 3L · 22 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or