Aruba vs Curazao Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compará Aruba vs Curazao: estadísticas mano a mano, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Aruba
Equipo Local
Curazao
Equipo Visitante
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Aruba
Empate
Curazao
Comparación Estadística
3V, 2E, 2D
2V, 3E, 5D
12 / 7 partidos
15 / 10 partidos
12 / 7 partidos
21 / 10 partidos
0
-6
2 / 7 partidos
4 / 10 partidos
5 / 7 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
3 / 7 partidos
4 / 10 partidos
2V / 3 partidos
1V / 3 partidos
1V / 4 partidos
1V / 7 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 70.0, Calidad del Rival: 53.1
Dificultad de Liga: 71.0, Calidad del Rival: 62.1
1V / 1 partidos
0V / 4 partidos
Real: 1.7 | Dif: -0.44
Real: 1.5 | Dif: +0.01
Ataque: 68.9, Defensa: 52.7, Forma: 52.3
Ataque: 50.0, Defensa: 30.0, Forma: 20.0
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Aruba
Curazao
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
Aruba has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 71.6 against considerably stronger competition than Curaçao (SoS: 50.1). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Aruba (1.7 goals per match) and Curaçao (1.5 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
Aruba's backline outperforms Curaçao's, with 1.7 goals conceded per match versus 2.1.
Curaçao has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Curaçao is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Aruba faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Curaçao can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 19.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Aruba. In practical terms, Aruba would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Aruba holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 57.0 against 37.7 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
In their recent Internationals match (2026-06-07), Curaçao prevailed 4-0 against Aruba. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Curaçao secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 4-0 scoreline was emphatic — Curaçao completely dominated Aruba in that encounter, raising serious questions about Aruba's ability to compete at this level. Aruba will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Curaçao will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Aruba
Curazao
En los enfrentamientos H2H (cara a cara), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo ejerce sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen de enfrentamientos directos
Esta comparación cara a cara analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia del rendimiento y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las calificaciones de poder se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles a favor, los goles en contra, el porcentaje de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Aruba
3W 2D 2L · 12 goles a favor · 12 goles en contra
Curazao
2W 3D 5L · 15 goles a favor · 21 goles en contra
Equipos Populares