Costa de Marfil vs Países Bajos Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compara Costa de Marfil vs Países Bajos: estadísticas cara a cara, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Costa de Marfil
Equipo Local
Países Bajos
Equipo Visitante
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Costa de Marfil
Empate
Países Bajos
Comparación Estadística
3V, 2E, 1D
3V, 0E, 1D
11 / 6 partidos
9 / 4 partidos
9 / 6 partidos
4 / 4 partidos
+2
+5
1 / 6 partidos
2 / 4 partidos
5 / 6 partidos
3 / 4 partidos
4 / 6 partidos
2 / 4 partidos
3V / 3 partidos
3V / 3 partidos
0V / 3 partidos
0V / 1 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 50.8, Calidad del Rival: 52.7
Dificultad de Liga: 76.2, Calidad del Rival: 70.5
0V / 1 partidos
3V / 3 partidos
Real: 1.8 | Dif: +0.23
Real: 2.2 | Dif: -0.44
Ataque: 53.3, Defensa: 44.4, Forma: 44.4
Ataque: 95.5, Defensa: 86.8, Forma: 97.7
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Costa de Marfil
Países Bajos
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
Context matters here: Netherlands's schedule strength (SoS: 80.2) has been notably more demanding than Côte d'Ivoire's (SoS: 38.8), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
Netherlands leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.2 goals per game compared to Côte d'Ivoire's 1.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Netherlands's backline outperforms Côte d'Ivoire's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.5.
Netherlands has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 3 of 3 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.
Netherlands has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Netherlands faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Côte d'Ivoire can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 38.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Netherlands. In practical terms, Netherlands would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Accounting for opponent quality throughout our evaluation, Netherlands emerges as the heavy favorite by every measurable indicator. A power rating of 87.0 compared to 48.8, combined with across-the-board statistical superiority, projects Netherlands as the likely winner and by a comfortable margin.
In their recent Under 21 Internationals match (2025-06-06), Netherlands prevailed 3-0 against Côte d'Ivoire. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Netherlands secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Netherlands completely dominated Côte d'Ivoire in that encounter, raising serious questions about Côte d'Ivoire's ability to compete at this level. Côte d'Ivoire will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Netherlands will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Costa de Marfil
Países Bajos
En los enfrentamientos H2H (duelos directos), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo impone sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen comparativo
Esta comparación de enfrentamientos directos analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia en la forma y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las valoraciones de potencia se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles marcados, los goles en contra, la tasa de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Costa de Marfil
3W 2D 1L · 11 goles marcados · 9 goles en contra
Países Bajos
3W 0D 1L · 9 goles marcados · 4 goles en contra
Equipos Populares