Utrecht vs NAC Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compara Utrecht vs NAC: estadísticas cara a cara, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Utrecht
Equipo Local
NAC
Equipo Visitante
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Utrecht
Empate
NAC
Comparación Estadística
6V, 1E, 3D
2V, 3E, 5D
18 / 10 partidos
10 / 10 partidos
15 / 10 partidos
20 / 10 partidos
+3
-10
3 / 10 partidos
2 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
4V / 4 partidos
1V / 4 partidos
2V / 6 partidos
1V / 6 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 73.0, Calidad del Rival: 61.5
Dificultad de Liga: 73.0, Calidad del Rival: 58.8
1V / 3 partidos
0V / 3 partidos
Real: 1.8 | Dif: -0.26
Real: 1.0 | Dif: -0.23
Ataque: 65.4, Defensa: 54.5, Forma: 65.4
Ataque: 33.3, Defensa: 33.3, Forma: 20.0
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Utrecht
NAC
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 59.0 vs 49.8), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Offensively, Utrecht outperforms NAC with 1.8 goals per match to 1.0, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Utrecht's backline outperforms NAC's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.
Utrecht has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
NAC has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Utrecht has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
📈 Form Momentum: Utrecht has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: NAC is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Utrecht is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while NAC shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Utrecht faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If NAC can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 25.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Utrecht. In practical terms, Utrecht would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Utrecht in this contest. Their superior power rating of 59.4, compared to 33.5 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
In their recent Dutch Eredivisie match (2026-05-02), Utrecht prevailed 2-0 against NAC. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Utrecht secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. NAC will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Utrecht will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Utrecht
NAC
En los enfrentamientos H2H (duelos directos), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo impone sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen comparativo
Esta comparación de enfrentamientos directos analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia en la forma y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las valoraciones de potencia se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles marcados, los goles en contra, la tasa de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Utrecht
6W 1D 3L · 18 goles marcados · 15 goles en contra
NAC
2W 3D 5L · 10 goles marcados · 20 goles en contra
Equipos Populares