Skip to content
Compare Armenia vs Kazakhstan

Armenia vs Kazakhstan Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Armenia vs Kazakhstan: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Armenia Armenia Home Team
Kazakhstan Kazakhstan Away Team
Armenia
28.0
D D L L L L L W L D

Last 10 Matches

Kazakhstan
42.9
L D W W L D D W L L

Performance Radar

Armenia
Kazakhstan

Categories Won

5

Armenia

2

Draw

8

Kazakhstan

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 3D, 6L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.5

25 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-17

-17

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Spertsyan (5 goals)
G. Kenzhebek (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
60.6

League Difficulty: 83.0, Opponent Quality: 66.1

54.7

League Difficulty: 82.5, Opponent Quality: 62.0

Elite Opponent Record
17%

1W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.88

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.08

1.31

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
28.0

Attack: 29.5, Defense: 18.4, Form: 11.1

42.9

Attack: 38.4, Defense: 55.8, Form: 31.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

2

31-45'

3

46-60'

3

61-75'

3

76-90+'

2
Armenia
Kazakhstan
Armenia

Power Rating Breakdown

28.0

Overall

Attack 29.5
Defense 18.4
Form 11.1
Consistency 74.8
Kazakhstan

Power Rating Breakdown

42.9

Overall

Attack 38.4
Defense 55.8
Form 31.4
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

83.0 vs 82.5

Opponent Quality

66.1 vs 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

17% vs 0%
Armenia logo Armenia
D
Moldova (38%)
D
Kazakhstan (56%)
L
Belarus (54%)
L
Portugal (84%)
L
Hungary (70%)
L
Rep. Ireland (76%)
L
Hungary (74%)
W
Rep. Ireland (71%)
Kazakhstan logo Kazakhstan
L
Hungary (72%)
D
Armenia (48%)
W
Comoros (58%)
W
Namibia (50%)
L
Faroe Islands (74%)
D
Belgium (79%)
D
N. Macedonia (57%)
W
Liechtenstein (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Moldova H
1 - 1 D
38%
Kazakhstan H
1 - 1 D
56%
Belarus H
1 - 2 L
54%
Portugal A
1 - 9 L
84%
Hungary H
0 - 1 L
70%
Rep. Ireland A
0 - 1 L
76%
Hungary A
0 - 2 L
74%
Rep. Ireland H
2 - 1 W
71%
Portugal H
0 - 5 L
79%
Montenegro A
2 - 2 D
59%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hungary A
1 - 3 L
72%
Armenia A
1 - 1 D
48%
Comoros H
1 - 0 W
58%
Namibia H
2 - 0 W
50%
Faroe Islands A
0 - 1 L
74%
Belgium H
1 - 1 D
79%
N. Macedonia A
1 - 1 D
57%
Liechtenstein H
4 - 0 W
38%
Belgium A
0 - 6 L
84%
Wales H
0 - 1 L
60%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 60.6 vs 54.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Kazakhstan leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.1 goals per game compared to Armenia's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Kazakhstan — 1.4 goals conceded per game and 3 clean sheets put them well ahead of Armenia, who give up 2.5 goals per match at the other end.

Armenia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Kazakhstan has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Armenia is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Kazakhstan faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Armenia can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 14.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Kazakhstan. In practical terms, Kazakhstan would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Kazakhstan holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 14.9-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the Internationals (2026-06-06). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Armenia

Armenia

VS
Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Armenia

1W 3D 6L · 8 goals scored · 25 conceded

Kazakhstan

3W 3D 4L · 11 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or