Skip to content
Compare Australia vs China

Australia vs China Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Australia vs China: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Australia Australia Home Team
China China Away Team
Australia
72.8
W L W W L W W D W W

Last 10 Matches

China
52.9
L L W W W W W W L L

Performance Radar

Australia
China

Categories Won

10

Australia

3

Draw

2

China

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
70%

7W, 1D, 2L

60%

6W, 0D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+14

+14

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Kerr (6 goals)
Wang Shuang (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 13 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
75%

3W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.7

League Difficulty: 59.0, Opponent Quality: 56.1

45.5

League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 58.6

Elite Opponent Record
50%

1W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.38

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.18

2.19

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: -0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
72.8

Attack: 77.5, Defense: 77.5, Form: 74.0

52.9

Attack: 66.9, Defense: 41.4, Form: 57.3

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

4

16-30'

3
4

31-45'

2
6

46-60'

5
1

61-75'

3

76-90+'

3
Australia
China
Australia

Power Rating Breakdown

72.8

Overall

Attack 77.5
Defense 77.5
Form 74.0
Consistency 53.2
China

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 66.9
Defense 41.4
Form 57.3
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.0 vs 62.5

Opponent Quality

56.1 vs 58.6

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 0%
Australia logo Australia
W
Mexico (76%)
L
Mexico (76%)
W
Kenya (60%)
W
Malawi (49%)
L
Japan (68%)
W
China (56%)
W
Korea DPR (55%)
D
South Korea (43%)
China logo China
L
Football Union of Russia (72%)
L
Australia (61%)
W
Chinese Taipei (50%)
W
Korea DPR (59%)
W
Uzbekistan (44%)
W
Bangladesh (25%)
W
Vietnam (53%)
W
Vietnam (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mexico H
3 - 1 W
76%
Mexico H
0 - 1 L
76%
Kenya A
2 - 0 W
60%
Malawi H
5 - 0 W
49%
Japan A
0 - 1 L
68%
China A
2 - 1 W
56%
Korea DPR H
2 - 1 W
55%
South Korea H
3 - 3 D
43%
Iran A
4 - 0 W
40%
Philippines H
1 - 0 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Football Union of Russia H
1 - 2 L
72%
Australia H
1 - 2 L
61%
Chinese Taipei H
2 - 0 W
50%
Korea DPR A
2 - 1 W
59%
Uzbekistan A
3 - 0 W
44%
Bangladesh H
2 - 0 W
25%
Vietnam H
6 - 1 W
53%
Vietnam H
2 - 0 W
53%
Scotland A
2 - 3 L
84%
England A
0 - 8 L
85%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

Australia has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.7) compared to China (SoS: 45.5). This means Australia's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.

Australia (2.2 goals per match) and China (2.1 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Australia — 0.8 goals conceded per game and 4 clean sheets put them well ahead of China, who give up 1.7 goals per match at the other end.

China has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Australia is a strong road performer with a 75% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.4 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

🔥 Form Momentum: Australia is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 22 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📈 Form Momentum: China has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: Both teams are on upward trajectories. Australia has won 7 of their last 5, while China has won 6. This clash of momentum makes the outcome particularly unpredictable.

💡 Why This Matters: The 19.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Australia. In practical terms, Australia would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Australia in this contest. Their superior power rating of 72.8, compared to 52.9 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

In the AFC Women's Asian Cup (2026-03-17), Australia eliminated China with a 1-2 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Australia showed they can handle the pressure. Notably, Australia achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against China shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. China will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Australia will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Australia

Australia

VS
China

China

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Australia

7W 1D 2L · 22 goals scored · 8 conceded

China

6W 0D 4L · 21 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or