Skip to content
Compare AZ vs Brann

AZ vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AZ vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AZ AZ Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
AZ
52.3
D D D D D W L W L W

Last 10 Matches

Brann
46.1
L L L W W W D L L W

Performance Radar

AZ
Brann

Categories Won

6

AZ

1

Draw

8

Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Mijnans (5 goals)
N. Holm (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.0

League Difficulty: 79.4, Opponent Quality: 65.7

38.3

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 52.4

Elite Opponent Record
17%

1W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.94

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.24

2.02

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
52.3

Attack: 61.8, Defense: 58.1, Form: 32.7

46.1

Attack: 61.8, Defense: 44.1, Form: 35.3

Goal Timing Analysis

9

0-15'

1

16-30'

4

31-45'

6
1

46-60'

3
4

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

5
AZ
Brann
AZ

Power Rating Breakdown

52.3

Overall

Attack 61.8
Defense 58.1
Form 32.7
Consistency 62.8
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

46.1

Overall

Attack 61.8
Defense 44.1
Form 35.3
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

79.4 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

65.7 vs 52.4

Elite Opponent Record

17% vs 0%
AZ logo AZ
D
NAC (47%)
D
Feyenoord (72%)
D
Twente (70%)
D
Go Ahead (64%)
D
Shakhtar D (70%)
W
Heerenveen (65%)
L
Shakhtar D (75%)
W
Fortuna (51%)
Brann logo Brann
L
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (67%)
L
Aalesund (50%)
W
KFUM (39%)
W
Fredrikstad (47%)
W
Tromsø (55%)
D
Rosenborg (44%)
L
Viking (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
NAC H
3 - 3 D
47%
Feyenoord A
1 - 1 D
72%
Twente H
2 - 2 D
70%
Go Ahead A
0 - 0 D
64%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 2 D
70%
Heerenveen H
3 - 0 W
65%
Shakhtar D A
0 - 3 L
75%
Fortuna H
2 - 0 W
51%
Groningen A
0 - 3 L
70%
Sparta Prague A
4 - 0 W
73%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sarpsborg H
1 - 2 L
42%
Bodø/Glimt A
1 - 3 L
67%
Aalesund A
1 - 2 L
50%
KFUM H
2 - 1 W
39%
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
47%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
55%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
44%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
76%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
47%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
57%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

AZ has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 59.0) compared to Brann (SoS: 38.3). This means AZ's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 2.1 goals per match versus AZ's 1.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with AZ conceding 1.4 and Brann conceding 1.5 per match.

AZ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

AZ has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AZ

AZ

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

AZ

3W 5D 2L · 17 goals scored · 14 conceded

Brann

4W 1D 5L · 21 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or