Skip to content
Compare AZ vs Excelsior

AZ vs Excelsior Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AZ vs Excelsior: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AZ AZ Home Team
Excelsior Excelsior Away Team
AZ
51.3
W W D D D D D D W L

Last 10 Matches

Excelsior
52.5
W W D W W D L D L L

Performance Radar

AZ
Excelsior

Categories Won

3

AZ

4

Draw

8

Excelsior

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 6D, 1L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Mijnans (3 goals)
D. Sanches Fernandes (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 13
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.3

League Difficulty: 69.1, Opponent Quality: 62.0

51.0

League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 58.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.09

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.19

2.44

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.44

Adjusted Power Rating
51.3

Attack: 62.9, Defense: 53.0, Form: 29.8

52.5

Attack: 67.3, Defense: 50.5, Form: 40.4

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

2

16-30'

2

31-45'

3

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

4
3

76-90+'

3
AZ
Excelsior
AZ

Power Rating Breakdown

51.3

Overall

Attack 62.9
Defense 53.0
Form 29.8
Consistency 68.5
Excelsior

Power Rating Breakdown

52.5

Overall

Attack 67.3
Defense 50.5
Form 40.4
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

69.1 vs 76.5

Opponent Quality

62.0 vs 58.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
AZ logo AZ
W
Olympiakos (41%)
W
Genk (45%)
D
ZW (66%)
D
NAC (50%)
D
Feyenoord (78%)
D
Twente (62%)
D
Go Ahead (66%)
D
Shakhtar D (72%)
Excelsior logo Excelsior
W
NAC (40%)
W
Sparta (50%)
D
Volendam (57%)
W
Groningen (58%)
W
Utrecht (66%)
D
Zwolle (56%)
L
NEC (73%)
D
Heracles (41%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Olympiakos H
3 - 2 W
41%
Genk H
4 - 0 W
45%
ZW A
1 - 1 D
66%
NAC H
3 - 3 D
50%
Feyenoord A
1 - 1 D
78%
Twente H
2 - 2 D
62%
Go Ahead A
0 - 0 D
66%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 2 D
72%
Heerenveen H
3 - 0 W
63%
Shakhtar D A
0 - 3 L
77%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
NAC A
3 - 1 W
40%
Sparta A
3 - 2 W
50%
Volendam H
1 - 1 D
57%
Groningen A
3 - 2 W
58%
Utrecht H
5 - 0 W
66%
Zwolle A
2 - 2 D
56%
NEC H
0 - 2 L
73%
Heracles A
1 - 1 D
41%
Feyenoord A
1 - 2 L
78%
Heerenveen H
1 - 2 L
63%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (49.3 vs 51.0), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

AZ (1.9 goals per match) and Excelsior (2.0 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Both defenses are comparable, with AZ conceding 1.4 and Excelsior conceding 1.5 per match.

AZ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.4 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Excelsior has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Excelsior's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AZ

AZ

VS
Excelsior

Excelsior

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

AZ

3W 6D 1L · 19 goals scored · 14 conceded

Excelsior

4W 3D 3L · 20 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or