AZ vs Excelsior Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare AZ vs Excelsior: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
AZ
Home Team
Excelsior
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
AZ
Draw
Excelsior
Statistical Comparison
3W, 6D, 1L
4W, 3D, 3L
19 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
+5
+5
3 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
3W / 6 matches
1W / 4 matches
0W / 4 matches
3W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 69.1, Opponent Quality: 62.0
League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 58.2
0W / 3 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.19
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.44
Attack: 62.9, Defense: 53.0, Form: 29.8
Attack: 67.3, Defense: 50.5, Form: 40.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
AZ
Excelsior
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (49.3 vs 51.0), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
AZ (1.9 goals per match) and Excelsior (2.0 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
Both defenses are comparable, with AZ conceding 1.4 and Excelsior conceding 1.5 per match.
AZ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.4 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Excelsior has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Excelsior's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
AZ
Excelsior
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
AZ
3W 6D 1L · 19 goals scored · 14 conceded
Excelsior
4W 3D 3L · 20 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams