Skip to content
Compare Ballymena Utd vs Cliftonville

Ballymena Utd vs Cliftonville Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Ballymena Utd vs Cliftonville: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Ballymena Utd Ballymena Utd Home Team
Cliftonville Cliftonville Away Team
Ballymena Utd
52.2
L L W D D W W W D L

Last 10 Matches

Cliftonville
59.7
L W W L W W W L W W

Performance Radar

Ballymena Utd
Cliftonville

Categories Won

4

Ballymena Utd

4

Draw

7

Cliftonville

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

70%

7W, 0D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Edogun (3 goals)
L. McStravick (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 18
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 1 matches

71%

5W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
44%

4W / 9 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.3

League Difficulty: 43.8, Opponent Quality: 48.0

46.1

League Difficulty: 43.2, Opponent Quality: 48.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.81

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.29

1.5

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.1

Adjusted Power Rating
52.2

Attack: 67.4, Defense: 51.4, Form: 38.5

59.7

Attack: 51.3, Defense: 70.5, Form: 67.3

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1

76-90+'

1
Ballymena Utd
Cliftonville
Ballymena Utd

Power Rating Breakdown

52.2

Overall

Attack 67.4
Defense 51.4
Form 38.5
Consistency 50.5
Cliftonville

Power Rating Breakdown

59.7

Overall

Attack 51.3
Defense 70.5
Form 67.3
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

43.8 vs 43.2

Opponent Quality

48.0 vs 48.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Ballymena Utd logo Ballymena Utd
L
Glentoran (45%)
L
Crusaders (55%)
W
Linfield (53%)
D
Glenavon (39%)
D
Annagh Utd (45%)
W
Portstewart (43%)
W
Carrick (62%)
W
Dundela (39%)
Cliftonville logo Cliftonville
L
Linfield (53%)
W
Bangor (49%)
W
Crusaders (50%)
L
Alvechurch (48%)
W
Warrenpoint (42%)
W
Newington (40%)
W
Moyola Park (36%)
L
Dungannon (55%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Glentoran H
0 - 2 L
45%
Crusaders A
1 - 2 L
55%
Linfield A
3 - 0 W
53%
Glenavon A
1 - 1 D
39%
Annagh Utd A
2 - 2 D
45%
Portstewart A
5 - 1 W
43%
Carrick A
3 - 0 W
62%
Dundela A
3 - 2 W
39%
Queen's Uni A
1 - 1 D
44%
Crusaders A
2 - 3 L
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Linfield A
0 - 1 L
53%
Bangor A
3 - 0 W
49%
Crusaders H
2 - 1 W
50%
Alvechurch H
1 - 2 L
48%
Warrenpoint H
2 - 1 W
42%
Newington H
1 - 0 W
40%
Moyola Park H
3 - 0 W
36%
Dungannon H
1 - 2 L
55%
Linfield A
2 - 1 W
53%
Dungannon H
1 - 0 W
55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 46.3 vs 46.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Ballymena Utd holds the attacking edge with 2.1 goals per match versus Cliftonville's 1.6, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Cliftonville has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Ballymena Utd's 1.4.

Ballymena Utd has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cliftonville has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cliftonville is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Ballymena Utd has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

🔥 Form Momentum: Cliftonville is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 16 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Cliftonville is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Ballymena Utd shows signs of decline with 4W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 69% win probability for Cliftonville. In practical terms, Cliftonville would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Cliftonville, with a 7.5-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Ballymena Utd

Ballymena Utd

VS
Cliftonville

Cliftonville

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Ballymena Utd

4W 3D 3L · 21 goals scored · 14 conceded

Cliftonville

7W 0D 3L · 16 goals scored · 8 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or