Skip to content
Compare Barnet vs Cambridge U

Barnet vs Cambridge U Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Barnet vs Cambridge U: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Barnet Barnet Home Team
Cambridge U Cambridge U Away Team
Barnet
59.1
W W W L D D L D W W

Last 10 Matches

Cambridge U
50.1
D W W D D W D W L D

Performance Radar

Barnet
Cambridge U

Categories Won

10

Barnet

2

Draw

3

Cambridge U

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+11

+11

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
90%

9 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Stead (6 goals)
B. Knight (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
43%

3W / 7 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.2

League Difficulty: 43.0, Opponent Quality: 48.4

44.4

League Difficulty: 43.0, Opponent Quality: 45.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.12

Actual: 2.4 | Diff: +0.28

1.06

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
59.1

Attack: 77.0, Defense: 54.5, Form: 48.1

50.1

Attack: 34.6, Defense: 75.5, Form: 37.8

Goal Timing Analysis

5

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

1

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

Barnet
Cambridge U
Barnet

Power Rating Breakdown

59.1

Overall

Attack 77.0
Defense 54.5
Form 48.1
Consistency 53.2
Cambridge U

Power Rating Breakdown

50.1

Overall

Attack 34.6
Defense 75.5
Form 37.8
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

43.0 vs 43.0

Opponent Quality

48.4 vs 45.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Barnet logo Barnet
W
Shrewsbury (38%)
W
Arsenal U21 (42%)
W
Salford (46%)
L
Cambridge U (59%)
D
Bromley (43%)
D
MK Dons (41%)
L
Oxford U (54%)
D
Luton (59%)
Cambridge U logo Cambridge U
D
Bromley (48%)
W
Wigan (36%)
W
Barnet (56%)
D
Norwich (50%)
D
Northampton (39%)
W
Preston (39%)
D
Crewe (51%)
W
Barrow (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Shrewsbury A
3 - 1 W
38%
Arsenal U21 H
5 - 1 W
42%
Salford H
3 - 1 W
46%
Cambridge U A
1 - 2 L
59%
Bromley H
1 - 1 D
43%
MK Dons H
0 - 0 D
41%
Oxford U H
1 - 2 L
54%
Luton H
2 - 2 D
59%
Harrogate A
2 - 1 W
64%
Gillingham H
6 - 2 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Bromley A
1 - 1 D
48%
Wigan H
3 - 2 W
36%
Barnet H
2 - 1 W
56%
Norwich A
0 - 0 D
50%
Northampton H
0 - 0 D
39%
Preston A
1 - 0 W
39%
Crewe A
0 - 0 D
51%
Barrow H
3 - 0 W
38%
Grimsby H
1 - 2 L
51%
Bromley A
0 - 0 D
46%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (46.2 vs 44.4), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Few sides can match Barnet in front of goal. Their 2.4 average per fixture tells the story, with C. Stead driving that output personally responsible for 6 goals this campaign.

Cambridge U's backline outperforms Barnet's, with 0.6 goals conceded per match versus 1.3.

Barnet has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cambridge U has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Barnet is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Barnet has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Cambridge U has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Barnet faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Cambridge U can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 72% win probability for Barnet. In practical terms, Barnet would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While Barnet holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 9.0-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In the English League Cup (2026-08-08), Cambridge U eliminated Barnet with a 2-1 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Cambridge U showed they can handle the pressure. Cambridge U secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Barnet will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Cambridge U will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Barnet

Barnet

VS
Cambridge U

Cambridge U

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Barnet

5W 3D 2L · 24 goals scored · 13 conceded

Cambridge U

4W 5D 1L · 11 goals scored · 6 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or