Bath vs Chippenham Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Bath vs Chippenham: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Bath
Home Team
Chippenham
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Bath
Draw
Chippenham
Statistical Comparison
3W, 2D, 5L
4W, 1D, 5L
16 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
22 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-6
+1
1 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7
League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 37.5
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.2
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.39
Attack: 48.3, Defense: 24.2, Form: 27.2
Attack: 45.4, Defense: 42.5, Form: 34.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Bath
Chippenham
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 40.6 vs 35.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Bath averaging 1.6 and Chippenham averaging 1.6 goals per match.
Chippenham has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Bath's 2.2.
Bath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Chippenham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Chippenham faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Bath can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: Bath's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-03), Bath prevailed 1-0 against Chippenham. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Bath secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Chippenham will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Bath will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Bath
Chippenham
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Bath
3W 2D 5L · 16 goals scored · 22 conceded
Chippenham
4W 1D 5L · 16 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams