Skip to content
Compare Brann vs Rosenborg

Brann vs Rosenborg Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs Rosenborg: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
Rosenborg Rosenborg Away Team
Brann
62.4
D W W L W W L D W W

Last 10 Matches

Rosenborg
46.6
W W L W L W W D L L

Performance Radar

Brann
Rosenborg

Categories Won

10

Brann

3

Draw

2

Rosenborg

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 2D, 2L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Castro (5 goals)
A. Chiakha (8 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.3

League Difficulty: 64.0, Opponent Quality: 58.3

37.4

League Difficulty: 49.5, Opponent Quality: 50.2

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.46

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.26

1.98

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
62.4

Attack: 75.0, Defense: 54.6, Form: 61.4

46.6

Attack: 58.3, Defense: 40.8, Form: 43.7

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

4
3

46-60'

1
5

61-75'

3
7

76-90+'

7
Brann
Rosenborg
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

62.4

Overall

Attack 75.0
Defense 54.6
Form 61.4
Consistency 52.0
Rosenborg

Power Rating Breakdown

46.6

Overall

Attack 58.3
Defense 40.8
Form 43.7
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

64.0 vs 49.5

Opponent Quality

58.3 vs 50.2

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
D
PAOK (71%)
W
HamKam (40%)
W
Apollon (77%)
L
Apollon (75%)
W
Rosenborg (51%)
W
U Cluj (68%)
L
Vålerenga (45%)
D
U Cluj (70%)
Rosenborg logo Rosenborg
W
Viking (59%)
W
Lillestrøm (47%)
L
Brann (64%)
W
Fredrikstad (48%)
L
Man Utd (50%)
W
Start (38%)
W
Kristiansund (35%)
D
Bodø/Glimt (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PAOK A
1 - 1 D
71%
HamKam H
3 - 0 W
40%
Apollon A
4 - 2 W
77%
Apollon H
0 - 1 L
75%
Rosenborg H
3 - 2 W
51%
U Cluj H
3 - 1 W
68%
Vålerenga H
2 - 3 L
45%
U Cluj A
2 - 2 D
70%
Molde A
2 - 1 W
53%
Start H
2 - 1 W
33%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Viking H
2 - 1 W
59%
Lillestrøm A
2 - 0 W
47%
Brann A
2 - 3 L
64%
Fredrikstad H
4 - 0 W
48%
Man Utd H
0 - 5 L
50%
Start A
3 - 0 W
38%
Kristiansund H
3 - 0 W
35%
Bodø/Glimt H
2 - 2 D
70%
KFUM A
0 - 2 L
47%
Aalesund H
2 - 3 L
44%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

Brann has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 52.3 against considerably stronger competition than Rosenborg (SoS: 37.4). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Brann averaging 2.2 and Rosenborg averaging 2.0 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Brann conceding 1.4 and Rosenborg conceding 1.6 per match.

Brann has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Statistical modeling projects 3.6 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Brann has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Rosenborg has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Brann faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Rosenborg can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 15.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Brann. In practical terms, Brann would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Brann holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 62.4 against 46.6 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent Norwegian Eliteserien match (2026-08-02), Brann prevailed 3-2 against Rosenborg. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Brann secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 3-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Rosenborg will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Brann will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
Rosenborg

Rosenborg

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Brann

6W 2D 2L · 22 goals scored · 14 conceded

Rosenborg

5W 1D 4L · 20 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or