Skip to content
Compare Broxburn Ath. vs Tranent

Broxburn Ath. vs Tranent Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Broxburn Ath. vs Tranent: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Broxburn Ath. Broxburn Ath. Home Team
Tranent Tranent Away Team
Broxburn Ath.
33.6
D W W L D L D L D D

Last 10 Matches

Tranent
51.0
W W W W L D L D W W

Performance Radar

Broxburn Ath.
Tranent

Categories Won

4

Broxburn Ath.

2

Draw

9

Tranent

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 5D, 3L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

+10

+10

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Q. Mitchell (3 goals)
G. McGarry (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.6

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 41.0

29.8

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 33.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.26

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.34

1.21

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.49

Adjusted Power Rating
33.6

Attack: 45.1, Defense: 19.7, Form: 16.9

51.0

Attack: 45.2, Defense: 61.2, Form: 47.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

4
2

31-45'

1
6

46-60'

7
2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

2
Broxburn Ath.
Tranent
Broxburn Ath.

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 45.1
Defense 19.7
Form 16.9
Consistency 67.3
Tranent

Power Rating Breakdown

51.0

Overall

Attack 45.2
Defense 61.2
Form 47.9
Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

41.0 vs 33.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Broxburn Ath. logo Broxburn Ath.
D
Dunipace (25%)
W
Cowdenbeath (39%)
W
Lochee Utd (31%)
L
Tranent (55%)
D
Bonnyrigg RA (48%)
L
Clydebank (63%)
D
Cumbernauld C. (38%)
L
Linlithgow (38%)
Tranent logo Tranent
W
East Stirling (35%)
W
Stirling Unv (17%)
W
Linlithgow (38%)
W
Broxburn Ath. (33%)
L
Braves (48%)
D
Berwick (40%)
L
Linlithgow (38%)
D
Bo'ness Utd (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dunipace A
2 - 2 D
25%
Cowdenbeath A
2 - 0 W
39%
Lochee Utd H
3 - 0 W
31%
Tranent A
0 - 3 L
55%
Bonnyrigg RA H
2 - 2 D
48%
Clydebank A
0 - 4 L
63%
Cumbernauld C. H
3 - 3 D
38%
Linlithgow H
1 - 6 L
38%
Braves A
1 - 1 D
48%
Strollers H
2 - 2 D
25%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
East Stirling A
3 - 0 W
35%
Stirling Unv A
2 - 1 W
17%
Linlithgow H
1 - 0 W
38%
Broxburn Ath. H
3 - 0 W
33%
Braves A
0 - 3 L
48%
Berwick A
0 - 0 D
40%
Linlithgow H
0 - 1 L
38%
Bo'ness Utd H
1 - 1 D
38%
Gala H
2 - 1 W
26%
Stirling Unv A
5 - 0 W
17%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (34.6 vs 29.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

The attacking output of Broxburn Ath. and Tranent is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.6 and 1.7 goals per game respectively.

Defensively, Tranent is far superior, conceding just 0.7 goals per match with 5 clean sheets, while Broxburn Ath. leaks 2.3 goals per match.

Broxburn Ath. has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tranent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tranent is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.1 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Broxburn Ath. is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Tranent has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Tranent is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Broxburn Ath. shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 17.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Tranent. In practical terms, Tranent would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Tranent in this contest. Their superior power rating of 51.0, compared to 33.6 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

In their recent Highland / Lowland match (2026-04-18), Tranent prevailed 3-0 against Broxburn Ath.. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Tranent secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Tranent completely dominated Broxburn Ath. in that encounter, raising serious questions about Broxburn Ath.'s ability to compete at this level. Broxburn Ath. will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Tranent will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Broxburn Ath.

Broxburn Ath.

VS
Tranent

Tranent

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Broxburn Ath.

2W 5D 3L · 16 goals scored · 23 conceded

Tranent

6W 2D 2L · 17 goals scored · 7 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or