Skip to content
Compare Celtic vs Gala

Celtic vs Gala Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Celtic vs Gala: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Celtic Celtic Home Team
Gala Gala Away Team
Celtic
46.9
W W W W D L D L L D

Last 10 Matches

Gala
31.2
L L L L W W W L L L

Performance Radar

Celtic
Gala

Categories Won

10

Celtic

3

Draw

2

Gala

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

30%

3W, 0D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
2.8

28 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
100%

10 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Clearie (6 goals)
L. Hall (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 18 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
32.7

League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 36.5

32.5

League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 36.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.28

Actual: 2.8 | Diff: +0.52

1.19

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.41

Adjusted Power Rating
46.9

Attack: 77.2, Defense: 24.8, Form: 33.1

31.2

Attack: 44.0, Defense: 16.5, Form: 24.8

Goal Timing Analysis

5

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

3
8

31-45'

4
5

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
Celtic
Gala
Celtic

Power Rating Breakdown

46.9

Overall

Attack 77.2
Defense 24.8
Form 33.1
Consistency 50.5
Gala

Power Rating Breakdown

31.2

Overall

Attack 44.0
Defense 16.5
Form 24.8
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

27.0 vs 27.0

Opponent Quality

36.5 vs 36.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Celtic logo Celtic
W
Cumnock (22%)
W
Dalbeattie (23%)
W
Hamilton (65%)
W
Renfrew (24%)
D
Johnstone (30%)
L
East Stirling (35%)
D
Cowdenbeath (34%)
L
Linlithgow (38%)
Gala logo Gala
L
Hill Of Beath (36%)
L
Rangers (48%)
L
Linlithgow (44%)
L
Bo'ness Utd (38%)
W
Gretna (17%)
W
Stirling Unv (17%)
W
Bo'ness Utd (38%)
L
Strollers (30%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cumnock H
4 - 1 W
22%
Dalbeattie A
5 - 1 W
23%
Hamilton A
3 - 1 W
65%
Renfrew A
5 - 3 W
24%
Johnstone H
1 - 1 D
30%
East Stirling A
2 - 3 L
35%
Cowdenbeath H
2 - 2 D
34%
Linlithgow H
1 - 3 L
38%
Albion A
2 - 3 L
46%
Bonnyrigg RA H
3 - 3 D
48%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hill Of Beath H
3 - 4 L
36%
Rangers H
0 - 4 L
48%
Linlithgow A
0 - 5 L
44%
Bo'ness Utd H
1 - 3 L
38%
Gretna H
3 - 0 W
17%
Stirling Unv A
2 - 0 W
17%
Bo'ness Utd H
3 - 1 W
38%
Strollers A
1 - 2 L
30%
Tranent A
1 - 2 L
55%
Cumbernauld C. H
2 - 3 L
38%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (32.7 vs 32.5), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Celtic's attack is on another level, averaging 2.8 goals per match with L. Clearie leading the charge (6 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

Defensively, Celtic and Gala are evenly matched, allowing 2.1 and 2.4 goals per game respectively.

Celtic has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Gala has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Celtic is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 4.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Celtic has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Celtic faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.1 goals per match. If Gala can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 15.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Celtic. In practical terms, Celtic would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Celtic emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (46.9 vs 31.2) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Celtic

Celtic

VS
Gala

Gala

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Celtic

4W 3D 3L · 28 goals scored · 21 conceded

Gala

3W 0D 7L · 16 goals scored · 24 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or