Skip to content
Compare Cerezo vs Avispa

Cerezo vs Avispa Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cerezo vs Avispa: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cerezo Cerezo Home Team
Avispa Avispa Away Team
Cerezo
58.6
W L W W W

Last 10 Matches

Avispa
43.4
L W L D

Performance Radar

Cerezo
Avispa

Categories Won

6

Cerezo

4

Draw

5

Avispa

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
80%

4W, 0D, 1L

25%

1W, 1D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

5 / 5 matches

1.2

5 / 4 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

4 / 5 matches

1.0

4 / 4 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
60%

3 / 5 matches

50%

2 / 4 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

2 / 5 matches

50%

2 / 4 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

1 / 5 matches

25%

1 / 4 matches

Top Scorer
S. Sakuragawa (2 goals)
Y. Tsujioka (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
100%

4W / 4 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.7

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.2

47.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.92

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.08

1.11

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
58.6

Attack: 31.9, Defense: 70.2, Form: 76.6

43.4

Attack: 38.8, Defense: 64.7, Form: 24.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

31-45'

3

46-60'

1

61-75'

1

76-90+'

1
Cerezo
Avispa
Cerezo

Power Rating Breakdown

58.6

Overall

Attack 31.9
Defense 70.2
Form 76.6
Consistency 56.8
Avispa

Power Rating Breakdown

43.4

Overall

Attack 38.8
Defense 64.7
Form 24.3
Consistency 55.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.2 vs 48.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cerezo logo Cerezo
W
Shimizu (48%)
L
Avispa (46%)
W
Fagiano (39%)
W
Dortmund (55%)
W
Tochigi City (43%)
Avispa logo Avispa
L
Kashima (53%)
W
Cerezo (51%)
L
Vissel Kobe (45%)
D
Kagoshima Utd (45%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Shimizu H
1 - 0 W
48%
Avispa A
0 - 3 L
46%
Fagiano H
2 - 1 W
39%
Dortmund H
1 - 0 W
55%
Tochigi City H
1 - 0 W
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Kashima A
2 - 3 L
53%
Cerezo H
3 - 0 W
51%
Vissel Kobe H
0 - 1 L
45%
Kagoshima Utd H
0 - 0 D
45%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 45.7 vs 47.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

The attacking output of Cerezo and Avispa is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.0 and 1.2 goals per game respectively.

Defensively, Cerezo and Avispa are evenly matched, allowing 0.8 and 1.0 goals per game respectively.

Cerezo has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Avispa has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cerezo has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.0 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

📈 Form Momentum: Cerezo has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.4 points per game over their last 5 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Avispa is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Cerezo is on the rise with 4W in last 5, while Avispa shows signs of decline with 1W in last 4.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Cerezo faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Avispa can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 15.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Cerezo. In practical terms, Cerezo would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Cerezo holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 58.6 against 43.4 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent Japanese J1 League match (2026-08-15), Avispa prevailed 3-0 against Cerezo. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Avispa secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Avispa completely dominated Cerezo in that encounter, raising serious questions about Cerezo's ability to compete at this level. Cerezo will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Avispa will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cerezo

Cerezo

VS
Avispa

Avispa

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Cerezo

4W 0D 1L · 5 goals scored · 4 conceded

Avispa

1W 1D 2L · 5 goals scored · 4 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or