Charlton vs Ipswich Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Charlton vs Ipswich: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Charlton
Home Team
Ipswich
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Charlton
Draw
Ipswich
Statistical Comparison
2W, 3D, 5L
5W, 2D, 3L
8 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
-5
+5
3 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.5
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.2
0W / 1 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.09
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07
Attack: 22.5, Defense: 47.8, Form: 16.9
Attack: 44.9, Defense: 53.3, Form: 42.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Charlton
Ipswich
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 34.3 vs 34.2), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Ipswich leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.6 goals per game compared to Charlton's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Charlton giving up 1.3 and Ipswich giving up 1.1 per fixture.
Statistical modeling projects 2.4 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Charlton is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Ipswich has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Ipswich is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Charlton shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Ipswich faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Charlton can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 13.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 84% win probability for Ipswich. In practical terms, Ipswich would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
While Ipswich holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 13.4-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the English WSL 2 (2026-02-18). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Charlton
Ipswich
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Charlton
2W 3D 5L · 8 goals scored · 13 conceded
Ipswich
5W 2D 3L · 16 goals scored · 11 conceded
Popular Teams