Skip to content
Compare Charlton vs Ipswich

Charlton vs Ipswich Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Charlton vs Ipswich: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Charlton Charlton Home Team
Ipswich Ipswich Away Team
Charlton
32.9
D L D L L L W L W D

Last 10 Matches

Ipswich
46.3
W W W L L L W D W D

Performance Radar

Charlton
Ipswich

Categories Won

2

Charlton

2

Draw

11

Ipswich

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
G. Kenney (3 goals)
S. Peskett (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.5

34.2

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.71

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.09

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
32.9

Attack: 22.5, Defense: 47.8, Form: 16.9

46.3

Attack: 44.9, Defense: 53.3, Form: 42.1

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

5

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

3

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

2
Charlton
Ipswich
Charlton

Power Rating Breakdown

32.9

Overall

Attack 22.5
Defense 47.8
Form 16.9
Consistency 61.3
Ipswich

Power Rating Breakdown

46.3

Overall

Attack 44.9
Defense 53.3
Form 42.1
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.5 vs 46.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Charlton logo Charlton
D
Leicester (20%)
L
Birmingham (52%)
D
Southampton (58%)
L
Liverpool (43%)
L
Crystal Palace (70%)
L
Bristol City (52%)
W
Sunderland (38%)
L
Portsmouth (26%)
Ipswich logo Ipswich
W
Sunderland (38%)
W
Birmingham (57%)
W
Sheff Utd (30%)
L
Crystal Palace (70%)
L
Southampton (53%)
L
Forest (48%)
W
Durham (43%)
D
Charlton (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Leicester H
0 - 0 D
20%
Birmingham H
0 - 2 L
52%
Southampton A
2 - 2 D
58%
Liverpool H
0 - 1 L
43%
Crystal Palace A
2 - 3 L
70%
Bristol City A
1 - 2 L
52%
Sunderland H
1 - 0 W
38%
Portsmouth H
0 - 2 L
26%
Oxford A
1 - 0 W
49%
Ipswich A
1 - 1 D
57%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sunderland H
2 - 1 W
38%
Birmingham A
3 - 0 W
57%
Sheff Utd H
4 - 1 W
30%
Crystal Palace A
0 - 1 L
70%
Southampton H
1 - 2 L
53%
Forest A
0 - 2 L
48%
Durham H
2 - 1 W
43%
Charlton H
1 - 1 D
38%
Portsmouth A
2 - 1 W
31%
Newcastle A
1 - 1 D
54%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 34.3 vs 34.2), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Ipswich leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.6 goals per game compared to Charlton's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Charlton giving up 1.3 and Ipswich giving up 1.1 per fixture.

Statistical modeling projects 2.4 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Charlton is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Ipswich has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Ipswich is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Charlton shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Ipswich faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Charlton can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 13.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 84% win probability for Ipswich. In practical terms, Ipswich would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Ipswich holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 13.4-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the English WSL 2 (2026-02-18). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Charlton

Charlton

VS
Ipswich

Ipswich

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Charlton

2W 3D 5L · 8 goals scored · 13 conceded

Ipswich

5W 2D 3L · 16 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or