Skip to content
Compare Chesterfield vs Cambridge Utd

Chesterfield vs Cambridge Utd Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Chesterfield vs Cambridge Utd: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Chesterfield Chesterfield Home Team
Cambridge Utd Cambridge Utd Away Team
Chesterfield
54.5
D L W W D W D W W W

Last 10 Matches

Cambridge Utd
47.8
D W L D W D D L W D

Performance Radar

Chesterfield
Cambridge Utd

Categories Won

4

Chesterfield

8

Draw

3

Cambridge Utd

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 3D, 1L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.5

5 / 10 matches

0.5

5 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Bonis (4 goals)
J. Gibbons (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.9

League Difficulty: 40.0, Opponent Quality: 41.5

44.0

League Difficulty: 40.0, Opponent Quality: 46.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.95

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.15

0.95

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
54.5

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 75.8, Form: 54.5

47.8

Attack: 34.5, Defense: 78.3, Form: 28.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

2
4

31-45'

4

46-60'

3
4

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

Chesterfield
Cambridge Utd
Chesterfield

Power Rating Breakdown

54.5

Overall

Attack 33.3
Defense 75.8
Form 54.5
Consistency 61.3
Cambridge Utd

Power Rating Breakdown

47.8

Overall

Attack 34.5
Defense 78.3
Form 28.2
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

40.0 vs 40.0

Opponent Quality

41.5 vs 46.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Chesterfield logo Chesterfield
D
Notts Co (54%)
L
Notts Co (49%)
W
Swindon (44%)
W
Crewe (38%)
D
Fleetwood (46%)
W
Grimsby (51%)
D
Tranmere (31%)
W
Barrow (33%)
Cambridge Utd logo Cambridge Utd
D
Crewe (43%)
W
Barrow (28%)
L
Grimsby (51%)
D
Bromley (53%)
W
Notts Co (49%)
D
Cheltenham (42%)
D
Swindon (40%)
L
Barnet (65%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Notts Co A
0 - 0 D
54%
Notts Co H
0 - 1 L
49%
Swindon A
2 - 1 W
44%
Crewe H
2 - 0 W
38%
Fleetwood A
1 - 1 D
46%
Grimsby H
2 - 1 W
51%
Tranmere H
1 - 1 D
31%
Barrow A
1 - 0 W
33%
Cheltenham H
1 - 0 W
37%
Accrington A
1 - 0 W
32%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Crewe A
0 - 0 D
43%
Barrow H
3 - 0 W
28%
Grimsby H
1 - 2 L
51%
Bromley A
0 - 0 D
53%
Notts Co H
4 - 0 W
49%
Cheltenham A
1 - 1 D
42%
Swindon H
1 - 1 D
40%
Barnet A
0 - 1 L
65%
Salford H
1 - 0 W
50%
Walsall A
0 - 0 D
46%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.9 vs 44.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Chesterfield averaging 1.1 and Cambridge Utd averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Chesterfield conceding 0.5 and Cambridge Utd conceding 0.5 per match.

Chesterfield has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cambridge Utd has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chesterfield is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 1.6 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being unlikely.

Chesterfield has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Chesterfield

Chesterfield

VS
Cambridge Utd

Cambridge Utd

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Chesterfield

6W 3D 1L · 11 goals scored · 5 conceded

Cambridge Utd

3W 5D 2L · 11 goals scored · 5 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or