Skip to content
Compare Chinese Taipei vs Japan

Chinese Taipei vs Japan Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Chinese Taipei vs Japan: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Chinese Taipei Chinese Taipei Home Team
Japan Japan Away Team
Chinese Taipei
56.7
L L W W L W W W

Last 10 Matches

Japan
79.3
L W L W L W W W W W

Performance Radar

Chinese Taipei
Japan

Categories Won

1

Chinese Taipei

1

Draw

13

Japan

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
62%

5W, 0D, 3L

70%

7W, 0D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

11 / 8 matches

3.4

34 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

9 / 8 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+27

+27

Clean Sheet
50%

4 / 8 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
38%

3 / 8 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
12%

1 / 8 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Su Yu-hsuan (2 goals)
R. Ueki (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 15 / 2nd Half: 19
Home Win Rate
50%

1W / 2 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.7

League Difficulty: 58.1, Opponent Quality: 54.1

56.5

League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 61.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.34

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.04

3.0

Actual: 3.4 | Diff: +0.4

Adjusted Power Rating
56.7

Attack: 49.3, Defense: 66.9, Form: 65.5

79.3

Attack: 100, Defense: 81.7, Form: 74.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

7

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

8

61-75'

8
1

76-90+'

5
Chinese Taipei
Japan
Chinese Taipei

Power Rating Breakdown

56.7

Overall

Attack 49.3
Defense 66.9
Form 65.5
Consistency 36.7
Japan

Power Rating Breakdown

79.3

Overall

Attack 100
Defense 81.7
Form 74.5
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.1 vs 62.5

Opponent Quality

54.1 vs 61.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 40%
Chinese Taipei logo Chinese Taipei
L
Korea DPR (55%)
L
China (56%)
W
India (31%)
W
Vietnam (33%)
L
Japan (68%)
W
Nepal (64%)
W
Indonesia (64%)
W
Philippines (62%)
Japan logo Japan
L
South Africa (76%)
W
South Africa (76%)
L
United States (84%)
W
United States (84%)
L
United States (84%)
W
Australia (61%)
W
South Korea (48%)
W
Philippines (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Korea DPR H
0 - 4 L
55%
China A
0 - 2 L
56%
India A
3 - 1 W
31%
Vietnam H
1 - 0 W
33%
Japan A
0 - 2 L
68%
Nepal A
1 - 0 W
64%
Indonesia A
5 - 0 W
64%
Philippines A
1 - 0 W
62%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
South Africa H
0 - 1 L
76%
South Africa H
5 - 0 W
76%
United States A
0 - 3 L
84%
United States A
1 - 0 W
84%
United States A
1 - 2 L
84%
Australia H
1 - 0 W
61%
South Korea A
4 - 1 W
48%
Philippines H
7 - 0 W
38%
Vietnam H
4 - 0 W
33%
India A
11 - 0 W
31%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 55.7 vs 56.5), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Japan's attack is on another level, averaging 3.4 goals per match with R. Ueki leading the charge (7 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

Japan's backline outperforms Chinese Taipei's, with 0.7 goals conceded per match versus 1.1.

Chinese Taipei has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Japan has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Japan has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Chinese Taipei is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.3 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Chinese Taipei has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.88 points per game over their last 8 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

🔥 Form Momentum: Japan is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 34 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

💡 Why This Matters: The 22.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Japan. In practical terms, Japan would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Japan emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (79.3 vs 56.7) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

In the AFC Women's Asian Cup (2026-03-04), Japan eliminated Chinese Taipei with a 2-0 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Japan showed they can handle the pressure. Japan secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Chinese Taipei will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Japan will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Chinese Taipei

Chinese Taipei

VS
Japan

Japan

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Chinese Taipei

5W 0D 3L · 11 goals scored · 9 conceded

Japan

7W 0D 3L · 34 goals scored · 7 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or