Cincinnati vs Chicago Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Cincinnati vs Chicago: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Cincinnati
Home Team
Chicago
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Cincinnati
Draw
Chicago
Statistical Comparison
4W, 4D, 2L
6W, 1D, 3L
27 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
22 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
+5
+3
0 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
4W / 6 matches
3W / 4 matches
0W / 4 matches
3W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.4
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.3
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 2.7 | Diff: +0.16
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.03
Attack: 92.0, Defense: 27.3, Form: 40.9
Attack: 62.4, Defense: 52.0, Form: 62.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Cincinnati
Chicago
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.2 vs 54.0), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Cincinnati leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.7 goals per game compared to Chicago's 1.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Chicago has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Cincinnati's 2.2.
Cincinnati has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Chicago has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Chicago has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 4.1 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Cincinnati has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📈 Form Momentum: Chicago has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Chicago's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Cincinnati
Chicago
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Cincinnati
4W 4D 2L · 27 goals scored · 22 conceded
Chicago
6W 1D 3L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams