Skip to content
Compare Clydebank vs Cumbernauld C.

Clydebank vs Cumbernauld C. Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Clydebank vs Cumbernauld C.: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Clydebank Clydebank Home Team
Cumbernauld C. Cumbernauld C. Away Team
Clydebank
69.2
W L W W W W W W W L

Last 10 Matches

Cumbernauld C.
59.9
W L W W D W W L W W

Performance Radar

Clydebank
Cumbernauld C.

Categories Won

11

Clydebank

2

Draw

2

Cumbernauld C.

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
80%

8W, 0D, 2L

70%

7W, 1D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
3.4

34 / 10 matches

3.1

31 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+25

+25

+17

+17

Clean Sheet
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

100%

10 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. McLaughlin (10 goals)
T. Horn (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 18 / 2nd Half: 16
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 19
Home Win Rate
100%

3W / 3 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
71%

5W / 7 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.8

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 41.3

30.7

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 34.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.58

Actual: 3.4 | Diff: +0.82

2.33

Actual: 3.1 | Diff: +0.77

Adjusted Power Rating
69.2

Attack: 84.8, Defense: 59.4, Form: 67.8

59.9

Attack: 80.7, Defense: 43.0, Form: 56.5

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

4
6

16-30'

1
6

31-45'

6
7

46-60'

7
5

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

11
Clydebank
Cumbernauld C.
Clydebank

Power Rating Breakdown

69.2

Overall

Attack 84.8
Defense 59.4
Form 67.8
Consistency 56.8
Cumbernauld C.

Power Rating Breakdown

59.9

Overall

Attack 80.7
Defense 43.0
Form 56.5
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

41.3 vs 34.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Clydebank logo Clydebank
W
Braves (43%)
L
Linlithgow (67%)
W
Broxburn Ath. (26%)
W
Cowdenbeath (36%)
W
Albion (48%)
W
Hearts (29%)
W
East Stirling (32%)
W
Bonnyrigg RA (40%)
Cumbernauld C. logo Cumbernauld C.
W
Stirling Unv (22%)
L
Bo'ness Utd (30%)
W
Gretna (29%)
W
Berwick (52%)
D
Broxburn Ath. (31%)
W
Strollers (31%)
W
Fairydean (32%)
L
Tranent (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Braves H
2 - 0 W
43%
Linlithgow A
1 - 4 L
67%
Broxburn Ath. H
4 - 0 W
26%
Cowdenbeath A
4 - 0 W
36%
Albion A
1 - 0 W
48%
Hearts A
8 - 0 W
29%
East Stirling A
6 - 0 W
32%
Bonnyrigg RA H
5 - 1 W
40%
Berwick A
2 - 1 W
52%
Celtic A
1 - 3 L
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Stirling Unv H
4 - 1 W
22%
Bo'ness Utd A
2 - 3 L
30%
Gretna H
3 - 1 W
29%
Berwick A
3 - 2 W
52%
Broxburn Ath. A
3 - 3 D
31%
Strollers A
5 - 0 W
31%
Fairydean A
3 - 2 W
32%
Tranent H
1 - 2 L
50%
Hearts H
3 - 0 W
24%
Albion H
4 - 0 W
44%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 34.8 vs 30.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Clydebank averaging 3.4 and Cumbernauld C. averaging 3.1 goals per match.

Clydebank has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to Cumbernauld C.'s 1.4.

Clydebank has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cumbernauld C. has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Clydebank, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Clydebank is a strong road team with a 71% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Clydebank has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Clydebank

Clydebank

VS
Cumbernauld C.

Cumbernauld C.

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Clydebank

8W 0D 2L · 34 goals scored · 9 conceded

Cumbernauld C.

7W 1D 2L · 31 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or