Skip to content
Compare Como vs Pisa

Como vs Pisa Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Como vs Pisa: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Como Como Home Team
Pisa Pisa Away Team
Como
61.5
W W W D W L L L D W

Last 10 Matches

Pisa
33.8
L D W L L L L L L L

Performance Radar

Como
Pisa

Categories Won

11

Como

2

Draw

2

Pisa

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

10%

1W, 1D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+9

+9

-9

-9

Clean Sheet
60%

6 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
S. Moreo (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
57.9

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 67.6

52.0

League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 61.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.25

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.35

1.11

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.11

Adjusted Power Rating
61.5

Attack: 68.3, Defense: 71.9, Form: 53.9

33.8

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 37.4, Form: 10.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1

16-30'

2
4

31-45'

5

46-60'

1
4

61-75'

3

76-90+'

Como
Pisa
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

61.5

Overall

Attack 68.3
Defense 71.9
Form 53.9
Consistency 45.7
Pisa

Power Rating Breakdown

33.8

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 37.4
Form 10.2
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

85.5 vs 76.5

Opponent Quality

67.6 vs 61.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Como logo Como
W
Cremonese (67%)
W
Parma (57%)
W
Verona (69%)
D
Napoli (70%)
W
Genoa (66%)
L
Inter Milan (70%)
L
Sassuolo (80%)
L
Inter Milan (82%)
Pisa logo Pisa
L
Pro Vercelli (45%)
D
Juventus NG (45%)
W
Pavia (40%)
L
Lazio (70%)
L
Napoli (70%)
L
Cremonese (67%)
L
Lecce (66%)
L
Parma (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cremonese A
4 - 1 W
67%
Parma H
1 - 0 W
57%
Verona A
1 - 0 W
69%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
70%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
66%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
80%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
82%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
68%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
47%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pro Vercelli H
0 - 1 L
45%
Juventus NG H
1 - 1 D
45%
Pavia H
6 - 1 W
40%
Lazio A
1 - 2 L
70%
Napoli H
0 - 3 L
70%
Cremonese A
0 - 3 L
67%
Lecce H
1 - 2 L
66%
Parma A
0 - 1 L
62%
Genoa H
1 - 2 L
60%
Roma A
0 - 3 L
85%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 57.9 vs 52.0), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Como holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Pisa's 1.0, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Como holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.0 goals per game and recording 6 clean sheets, compared to Pisa's leaky backline that surrenders 1.9 goals per match.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Pisa has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

📈 Form Momentum: Como has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Pisa is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Como is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Pisa shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 27.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Como. In practical terms, Como would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Como emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (61.5 vs 33.8) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

In the Italian Serie A (2026-03-22), Como beat Pisa 5-0. League results are the most consistent indicator of form, and this result speaks volumes about the current dynamic between these teams. Como secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 5-0 scoreline was emphatic — Como completely dominated Pisa in that encounter, raising serious questions about Pisa's ability to compete at this level. Pisa will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Como will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Como

Como

VS
Pisa

Pisa

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Como

5W 2D 3L · 19 goals scored · 10 conceded

Pisa

1W 1D 8L · 10 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or