C Palace vs KuPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare C Palace vs KuPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
C Palace
Home Team
KuPS
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
C Palace
Draw
KuPS
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
3W, 3D, 4L
16 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
-1
-2
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 74.8, Opponent Quality: 61.4
League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3
0W / 4 matches
0W / 3 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.03
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1
Attack: 54.1, Defense: 43.9, Form: 40.6
Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
C Palace
KuPS
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.4 vs 48.5), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Offensively, C Palace outperforms KuPS with 1.6 goals per match to 1.2, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to C Palace's 1.7.
C Palace has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, C Palace faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If KuPS can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: C Palace's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
C Palace
KuPS
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
C Palace
4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 17 conceded
KuPS
3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded
Popular Teams