Skip to content
Compare Dag & Red vs Bath

Dag & Red vs Bath Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dag & Red vs Bath: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dag & Red Dag & Red Home Team
Bath Bath Away Team
Dag & Red
39.8
W L D L D L W W W D

Last 10 Matches

Bath
36.1
D L L W L W L W L D

Performance Radar

Dag & Red
Bath

Categories Won

7

Dag & Red

4

Draw

4

Bath

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Oteh (4 goals)
S. Wilson (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
38.8

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 43.6

40.6

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

1.4

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.2

Adjusted Power Rating
39.8

Attack: 47.4, Defense: 29.6, Form: 35.5

36.1

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 24.2, Form: 27.2

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

2
6

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

3
Dag & Red
Bath
Dag & Red

Power Rating Breakdown

39.8

Overall

Attack 47.4
Defense 29.6
Form 35.5
Consistency 50.5
Bath

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 24.2
Form 27.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 33.0

Opponent Quality

43.6 vs 45.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Dag & Red logo Dag & Red
W
Hashtag Utd (43%)
L
Slough (26%)
D
Weston-s-Mare (36%)
L
Worthing (60%)
D
Chelmsford (40%)
L
Hornchurch (58%)
W
Hampton & RB (39%)
W
Torquay (48%)
Bath logo Bath
D
Newport (45%)
L
Plymouth (62%)
L
Maidstone (57%)
W
Dorking (39%)
L
Totton (43%)
W
Chesham (43%)
L
Torquay (53%)
W
Chippenham (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hashtag Utd A
2 - 1 W
43%
Slough A
2 - 3 L
26%
Weston-s-Mare H
0 - 0 D
36%
Worthing A
2 - 7 L
60%
Chelmsford H
3 - 3 D
40%
Hornchurch A
0 - 3 L
58%
Hampton & RB H
3 - 1 W
39%
Torquay H
1 - 0 W
48%
Farnborough A
3 - 2 W
48%
Enfield T A
0 - 0 D
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Newport H
2 - 2 D
45%
Plymouth H
0 - 3 L
62%
Maidstone H
2 - 3 L
57%
Dorking A
3 - 1 W
39%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Chesham H
4 - 2 W
43%
Torquay A
1 - 4 L
53%
Chippenham H
1 - 0 W
38%
Maidenhead A
0 - 3 L
48%
Eastbourne A
2 - 2 D
29%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (38.8 vs 40.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Dag & Red averaging 1.6 and Bath averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Defensively, Dag & Red and Bath are evenly matched, allowing 2.0 and 2.2 goals per game respectively.

Dag & Red has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Bath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.7 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Dag & Red has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Dag & Red faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Bath can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: Bath's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dag & Red

Dag & Red

VS
Bath

Bath

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Dag & Red

4W 3D 3L · 16 goals scored · 20 conceded

Bath

3W 2D 5L · 16 goals scored · 22 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or