Dender vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Dender vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Dender
Home Team
Brann
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Dender
Draw
Brann
Statistical Comparison
2W, 1D, 7L
4W, 1D, 5L
10 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-9
+6
2 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 56.6, Opponent Quality: 52.6
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 52.4
0W / 1 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.04
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.08
Attack: 30.3, Defense: 33.4, Form: 18.2
Attack: 61.8, Defense: 44.1, Form: 35.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Dender
Brann
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 41.0 vs 38.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.
Brann's attack is on another level, averaging 2.1 goals per match with N. Holm leading the charge with 4 goals. Dender manages just 1.0 per match.
Brann has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Dender's 1.9.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.
Brann has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Dender
Brann
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Dender
2W 1D 7L · 10 goals scored · 19 conceded
Brann
4W 1D 5L · 21 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams