Skip to content
Compare Dorking vs Horsham

Dorking vs Horsham Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dorking vs Horsham: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dorking Dorking Home Team
Horsham Horsham Away Team
Dorking
36.1
W L W D L L L L W D

Last 10 Matches

Horsham
36.7
L W W L L D L W L L

Performance Radar

Dorking
Horsham

Categories Won

5

Dorking

4

Draw

6

Horsham

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
P. McCallum (2 goals)
L. Gravata (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.2

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 44.3

39.8

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 44.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.26

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.14

0.92

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
36.1

Attack: 41.6, Defense: 32.7, Form: 26.8

36.7

Attack: 29.9, Defense: 50.9, Form: 26.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

3
Dorking
Horsham
Dorking

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 41.6
Defense 32.7
Form 26.8
Consistency 49.3
Horsham

Power Rating Breakdown

36.7

Overall

Attack 29.9
Defense 50.9
Form 26.9
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 33.0

Opponent Quality

44.3 vs 44.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Dorking logo Dorking
W
Lewes (46%)
L
Torquay (53%)
W
Maidenhead (43%)
D
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
L
Bath (33%)
L
Totton (43%)
L
Worthing (54%)
L
Horsham (38%)
Horsham logo Horsham
L
Sutton (41%)
W
Eastbourne T. (42%)
W
Chippenham (38%)
L
Salisbury (46%)
L
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
D
Maidstone (57%)
L
Farnborough (48%)
W
Dorking (34%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lewes A
2 - 1 W
46%
Torquay A
2 - 4 L
53%
Maidenhead H
2 - 0 W
43%
Weston-s-Mare A
1 - 1 D
40%
Bath H
1 - 3 L
33%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Worthing H
1 - 2 L
54%
Horsham A
0 - 3 L
38%
Hemel H H
2 - 1 W
40%
Torquay A
2 - 2 D
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sutton A
0 - 2 L
41%
Eastbourne T. H
3 - 0 W
42%
Chippenham H
3 - 2 W
38%
Salisbury A
1 - 2 L
46%
Weston-s-Mare A
0 - 1 L
40%
Maidstone H
0 - 0 D
57%
Farnborough A
0 - 2 L
48%
Dorking H
3 - 0 W
34%
Torquay A
0 - 2 L
53%
Hampton & RB A
0 - 2 L
44%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 39.2 vs 39.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Offensively, Dorking outperforms Horsham with 1.4 goals per match to 1.0, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Horsham's backline outperforms Dorking's, with 1.3 goals conceded per match versus 1.9.

Dorking has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Horsham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Horsham has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Statistical modeling projects 2.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Horsham's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-03), Horsham prevailed 3-0 against Dorking. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Horsham secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Horsham completely dominated Dorking in that encounter, raising serious questions about Dorking's ability to compete at this level. Dorking will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Horsham will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dorking

Dorking

VS
Horsham

Horsham

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Dorking

3W 2D 5L · 14 goals scored · 19 conceded

Horsham

3W 1D 6L · 10 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or