Skip to content
Compare East Fife vs QOTS

East Fife vs QOTS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare East Fife vs QOTS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

East Fife East Fife Home Team
QOTS QOTS Away Team
East Fife
44.7
D W W D D D L W L D

Last 10 Matches

QOTS
47.5
L L W D D D W D D W

Performance Radar

East Fife
QOTS

Categories Won

2

East Fife

4

Draw

9

QOTS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Austin (4 goals)
N. Clark (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
43.6

League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 46.7

46.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.17

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.03

1.66

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
44.7

Attack: 37.4, Defense: 62.4, Form: 28.1

47.5

Attack: 57.8, Defense: 48.2, Form: 28.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

1
4

61-75'

5
2

76-90+'

7
East Fife
QOTS
East Fife

Power Rating Breakdown

44.7

Overall

Attack 37.4
Defense 62.4
Form 28.1
Consistency 62.8
QOTS

Power Rating Breakdown

47.5

Overall

Attack 57.8
Defense 48.2
Form 28.9
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

39.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.7 vs 47.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
East Fife logo East Fife
D
St. Johnstone (69%)
W
Linlithgow (52%)
W
Morton (29%)
D
Inverness (62%)
D
Cove Rangers (41%)
D
Inverness (53%)
L
Alloa Athletic (39%)
W
Peterhead (32%)
QOTS logo QOTS
L
Queen's Park (54%)
L
Aberdeen (60%)
W
Brora Rangers (42%)
D
Kelty Hearts (45%)
D
Stenhousemuir (64%)
D
Stenhousemuir (59%)
W
Alloa Athletic (39%)
D
Montrose (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
St. Johnstone A
1 - 1 D
69%
Linlithgow H
3 - 1 W
52%
Morton H
2 - 0 W
29%
Inverness A
1 - 1 D
62%
Cove Rangers A
0 - 0 D
41%
Inverness H
1 - 1 D
53%
Alloa Athletic A
0 - 2 L
39%
Peterhead H
2 - 1 W
32%
Montrose A
0 - 1 L
43%
Stenhousemuir H
2 - 2 D
47%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Queen's Park A
1 - 3 L
54%
Aberdeen H
1 - 4 L
60%
Brora Rangers A
3 - 0 W
42%
Kelty Hearts H
1 - 1 D
45%
Stenhousemuir A
2 - 2 D
64%
Stenhousemuir H
1 - 1 D
59%
Alloa Athletic A
4 - 1 W
39%
Montrose H
2 - 2 D
38%
Peterhead A
1 - 1 D
37%
Cove Rangers H
2 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 43.6 vs 46.4), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

QOTS leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to East Fife's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

East Fife's backline outperforms QOTS's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.5.

East Fife has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

QOTS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: QOTS's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by small margins on the day.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

East Fife

East Fife

VS
QOTS

QOTS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

East Fife

3W 5D 2L · 12 goals scored · 10 conceded

QOTS

3W 5D 2L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or