Egnatia vs Celje Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Egnatia vs Celje: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Celje
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Egnatia
Draw
Celje
Statistical Comparison
2W, 4D, 1L
4W, 4D, 2L
18 / 7 matches
17 / 10 matches
11 / 7 matches
16 / 10 matches
+7
+1
1 / 7 matches
3 / 10 matches
5 / 7 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 7 matches
6 / 10 matches
2W / 4 matches
2W / 5 matches
0W / 3 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 91.9, Opponent Quality: 71.1
League Difficulty: 87.5, Opponent Quality: 73.0
1W / 5 matches
2W / 7 matches
Actual: 2.6 | Diff: -0.62
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.28
Attack: 100, Defense: 54.4, Form: 33.8
Attack: 66.8, Defense: 55.0, Form: 47.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Celje
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (66.6 vs 67.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Egnatia holds the attacking edge with 2.6 goals per match versus Celje's 1.7, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Both defenses are comparable, with Egnatia conceding 1.6 and Celje conceding 1.6 per match.
Egnatia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Celje has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
❄️ Form Momentum: Egnatia is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 7 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Celje has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Egnatia faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.6 goals per match. If Celje can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 7.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 68% win probability for Egnatia. In practical terms, Egnatia would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
Egnatia has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.4-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 2-2 in the UEFA Champions League (2026-07-28). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. These two teams drew 3-3 in the UEFA Champions League (2026-07-22). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Egnatia
Celje
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Egnatia
2W 4D 1L · 18 goals scored · 11 conceded
Celje
4W 4D 2L · 17 goals scored · 16 conceded
Popular Teams