Skip to content
Compare Gala vs Cumbernauld C.

Gala vs Cumbernauld C. Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gala vs Cumbernauld C.: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gala Gala Home Team
Cumbernauld C. Cumbernauld C. Away Team
Gala
31.2
L L L L W W W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Cumbernauld C.
38.4
D D L L D W L W W D

Performance Radar

Gala
Cumbernauld C.

Categories Won

3

Gala

4

Draw

8

Cumbernauld C.

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 0D, 7L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

0

0

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Hall (3 goals)
J. Jack (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
32.5

League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 36.1

29.0

League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 30.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.19

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.41

1.48

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: +0.72

Adjusted Power Rating
31.2

Attack: 44.0, Defense: 16.5, Form: 24.8

38.4

Attack: 57.9, Defense: 21.1, Form: 23.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

7
1

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

7
Gala
Cumbernauld C.
Gala

Power Rating Breakdown

31.2

Overall

Attack 44.0
Defense 16.5
Form 24.8
Consistency 43.3
Cumbernauld C.

Power Rating Breakdown

38.4

Overall

Attack 57.9
Defense 21.1
Form 23.7
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

27.0 vs 27.0

Opponent Quality

36.1 vs 30.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gala logo Gala
L
Hill Of Beath (36%)
L
Rangers (48%)
L
Linlithgow (44%)
L
Bo'ness Utd (38%)
W
Gretna (17%)
W
Stirling Unv (17%)
W
Bo'ness Utd (38%)
L
Strollers (30%)
Cumbernauld C. logo Cumbernauld C.
D
Dalbeattie (21%)
D
Gretna (22%)
L
QOTS (43%)
L
Auchinleck (45%)
D
Renfrew (22%)
W
Stirling Unv (12%)
L
Bo'ness Utd (43%)
W
Gretna (17%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hill Of Beath H
3 - 4 L
36%
Rangers H
0 - 4 L
48%
Linlithgow A
0 - 5 L
44%
Bo'ness Utd H
1 - 3 L
38%
Gretna H
3 - 0 W
17%
Stirling Unv A
2 - 0 W
17%
Bo'ness Utd H
3 - 1 W
38%
Strollers A
1 - 2 L
30%
Tranent A
1 - 2 L
55%
Cumbernauld C. H
2 - 3 L
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dalbeattie H
2 - 2 D
21%
Gretna A
3 - 3 D
22%
QOTS A
0 - 4 L
43%
Auchinleck A
0 - 1 L
45%
Renfrew H
2 - 2 D
22%
Stirling Unv H
4 - 1 W
12%
Bo'ness Utd A
2 - 3 L
43%
Gretna H
3 - 1 W
17%
Berwick A
3 - 2 W
40%
Broxburn Ath. A
3 - 3 D
38%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 32.5 vs 29.0), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Cumbernauld C. leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.2 goals per game compared to Gala's 1.6 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Both defenses are comparable, with Gala conceding 2.4 and Cumbernauld C. conceding 2.2 per match.

Gala has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cumbernauld C. has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 4.2 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Cumbernauld C. faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.2 goals per match. If Gala can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 68% win probability for Cumbernauld C.. In practical terms, Cumbernauld C. would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Cumbernauld C., with a 7.2-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Highland / Lowland match (2026-03-14), Cumbernauld C. prevailed 2-3 against Gala. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Cumbernauld C. achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Gala shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 2-3 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Gala will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Cumbernauld C. will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gala

Gala

VS
Cumbernauld C.

Cumbernauld C.

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Gala

3W 0D 7L · 16 goals scored · 24 conceded

Cumbernauld C.

3W 4D 3L · 22 goals scored · 22 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or