Skip to content
Compare Gateshead vs Morecambe

Gateshead vs Morecambe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gateshead vs Morecambe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gateshead Gateshead Home Team
Morecambe Morecambe Away Team
Gateshead
42.0
D D L L W W D W W L

Last 10 Matches

Morecambe
32.7
L L L D W L L L D W

Performance Radar

Gateshead
Morecambe

Categories Won

7

Gateshead

2

Draw

6

Morecambe

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.6

26 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-9

-9

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ward (3 goals)
J. Nolan (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
41.9

League Difficulty: 37.0, Opponent Quality: 45.2

40.3

League Difficulty: 35.0, Opponent Quality: 43.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.15

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.15

1.28

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.42

Adjusted Power Rating
42.0

Attack: 39.8, Defense: 46.0, Form: 36.8

32.7

Attack: 51.2, Defense: 12.0, Form: 18.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

4
1

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

5
Gateshead
Morecambe
Gateshead

Power Rating Breakdown

42.0

Overall

Attack 39.8
Defense 46.0
Form 36.8
Consistency 50.5
Morecambe

Power Rating Breakdown

32.7

Overall

Attack 51.2
Defense 12.0
Form 18.1
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

37.0 vs 35.0

Opponent Quality

45.2 vs 43.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gateshead logo Gateshead
D
Newcastle (43%)
D
Hebburn (45%)
L
Altrincham (44%)
L
Woking (39%)
W
Aldershot (38%)
W
Scunthorpe (38%)
D
Carlisle (64%)
W
Yeovil (31%)
Morecambe logo Morecambe
L
Forest Green (54%)
L
Boreham Wood (60%)
L
Woking (44%)
D
Carlisle (59%)
W
Rochdale (48%)
L
Aldershot (33%)
L
Hartlepool (44%)
L
Yeovil (36%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Newcastle H
1 - 1 D
43%
Hebburn A
3 - 3 D
45%
Altrincham A
1 - 3 L
44%
Woking H
0 - 3 L
39%
Aldershot A
1 - 0 W
38%
Scunthorpe H
2 - 0 W
38%
Carlisle A
0 - 0 D
64%
Yeovil H
2 - 1 W
31%
York H
3 - 1 W
45%
Boreham Wood A
0 - 3 L
65%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Forest Green A
0 - 5 L
54%
Boreham Wood H
0 - 3 L
60%
Woking A
1 - 5 L
44%
Carlisle H
2 - 2 D
59%
Rochdale A
4 - 2 W
48%
Aldershot H
0 - 2 L
33%
Hartlepool H
2 - 3 L
44%
Yeovil A
2 - 3 L
36%
Braintree H
1 - 1 D
23%
Sutton A
5 - 0 W
37%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 41.9 vs 40.3), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Morecambe holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Gateshead's 1.3, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Gateshead holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.5 goals per game and recording 3 clean sheets, compared to Morecambe's leaky backline that surrenders 2.6 goals per match.

Gateshead has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Morecambe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Gateshead has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Morecambe is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Gateshead faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Morecambe can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 73% win probability for Gateshead. In practical terms, Gateshead would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While Gateshead holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 9.3-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gateshead

Gateshead

VS
Morecambe

Morecambe

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Gateshead

4W 3D 3L · 13 goals scored · 15 conceded

Morecambe

2W 2D 6L · 17 goals scored · 26 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or