Genk vs Standard Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Genk vs Standard: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Genk
Home Team
Standard
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Genk
Draw
Standard
Statistical Comparison
3W, 4D, 3L
4W, 2D, 4L
11 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
-1
+2
4 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
1W / 3 matches
2W / 6 matches
2W / 7 matches
2W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.9
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.7
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.07
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.18
Attack: 35.7, Defense: 58.4, Form: 29.2
Attack: 41.9, Defense: 61.2, Form: 38.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Genk
Standard
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 47.3 vs 46.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Genk (1.1 goals per match) and Standard (1.3 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
Both defenses are comparable, with Genk conceding 1.2 and Standard conceding 1.1 per match.
Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Standard has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.3 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
💡 Why This Matters: Genk's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 0-0 in the Belgian First Division A (2026-05-16). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. These two teams drew 1-1 in the Belgian First Division A (2026-04-25). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Genk
Standard
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Genk
3W 4D 3L · 11 goals scored · 12 conceded
Standard
4W 2D 4L · 13 goals scored · 11 conceded
Popular Teams