Skip to content
Compare Gillingham vs Cambridge Utd

Gillingham vs Cambridge Utd Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gillingham vs Cambridge Utd: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gillingham Gillingham Home Team
Cambridge Utd Cambridge Utd Away Team
Gillingham
31.8
W L L L D W D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Cambridge Utd
47.8
D W L D W D D L W D

Performance Radar

Gillingham
Cambridge Utd

Categories Won

3

Gillingham

4

Draw

8

Cambridge Utd

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

0.5

5 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-10

-10

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Hale (3 goals)
J. Gibbons (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.1

League Difficulty: 40.0, Opponent Quality: 46.8

44.0

League Difficulty: 40.0, Opponent Quality: 46.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.95

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.05

0.95

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
31.8

Attack: 31.4, Defense: 31.4, Form: 18.8

47.8

Attack: 34.5, Defense: 78.3, Form: 28.2

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

4
3

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

Gillingham
Cambridge Utd
Gillingham

Power Rating Breakdown

31.8

Overall

Attack 31.4
Defense 31.4
Form 18.8
Consistency 59.2
Cambridge Utd

Power Rating Breakdown

47.8

Overall

Attack 34.5
Defense 78.3
Form 28.2
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

40.0 vs 40.0

Opponent Quality

46.8 vs 46.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gillingham logo Gillingham
W
Shrewsbury (33%)
L
Barnet (65%)
L
Grimsby (51%)
L
Cheltenham (42%)
D
Salford (55%)
W
Accrington (27%)
D
Walsall (46%)
L
Crawley (47%)
Cambridge Utd logo Cambridge Utd
D
Crewe (43%)
W
Barrow (28%)
L
Grimsby (51%)
D
Bromley (53%)
W
Notts Co (49%)
D
Cheltenham (42%)
D
Swindon (40%)
L
Barnet (65%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Shrewsbury H
1 - 0 W
33%
Barnet A
2 - 6 L
65%
Grimsby H
1 - 4 L
51%
Cheltenham A
1 - 2 L
42%
Salford A
0 - 0 D
55%
Accrington H
2 - 0 W
27%
Walsall A
2 - 2 D
46%
Crawley A
0 - 2 L
47%
Bristol Rovers H
1 - 2 L
62%
Swindon H
0 - 2 L
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Crewe A
0 - 0 D
43%
Barrow H
3 - 0 W
28%
Grimsby H
1 - 2 L
51%
Bromley A
0 - 0 D
53%
Notts Co H
4 - 0 W
49%
Cheltenham A
1 - 1 D
42%
Swindon H
1 - 1 D
40%
Barnet A
0 - 1 L
65%
Salford H
1 - 0 W
50%
Walsall A
0 - 0 D
46%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.1 vs 44.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Gillingham averaging 1.0 and Cambridge Utd averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Defensively, Cambridge Utd is far superior, conceding just 0.5 goals per match with 6 clean sheets, while Gillingham leaks 2.0 per match.

Gillingham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cambridge Utd has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.3 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Cambridge Utd emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (47.8 vs 31.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gillingham

Gillingham

VS
Cambridge Utd

Cambridge Utd

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Gillingham

2W 2D 6L · 10 goals scored · 20 conceded

Cambridge Utd

3W 5D 2L · 11 goals scored · 5 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or