Skip to content
Compare Glenavon vs Portadown

Glenavon vs Portadown Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Glenavon vs Portadown: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Glenavon Glenavon Home Team
Portadown Portadown Away Team
Glenavon
32.7
D L L L L D D D L W

Last 10 Matches

Portadown
43.3
L L L W W L W W L D

Performance Radar

Glenavon
Portadown

Categories Won

0

Glenavon

5

Draw

10

Portadown

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 4D, 5L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-9

-9

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
P. Burns (2 goals)
E. Fyfe (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

4W / 8 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
47.7

League Difficulty: 42.9, Opponent Quality: 50.9

49.2

League Difficulty: 42.9, Opponent Quality: 53.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.7

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.1

1.34

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
32.7

Attack: 26.1, Defense: 42.3, Form: 9.8

43.3

Attack: 46.3, Defense: 46.3, Form: 39.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

3

76-90+'

2
Glenavon
Portadown
Glenavon

Power Rating Breakdown

32.7

Overall

Attack 26.1
Defense 42.3
Form 9.8
Consistency 75.7
Portadown

Power Rating Breakdown

43.3

Overall

Attack 46.3
Defense 46.3
Form 39.7
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

42.9 vs 42.9

Opponent Quality

50.9 vs 53.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Glenavon logo Glenavon
D
Ballymena Utd (51%)
L
Crusaders (56%)
L
Doncaster (48%)
L
Carrick (56%)
L
Crusaders (50%)
D
Bangor (49%)
D
Ballymena Utd (55%)
D
Portadown (42%)
Portadown logo Portadown
L
Crusaders (55%)
L
Dungannon (55%)
L
Carrick (61%)
W
Kilbarrack Utd (43%)
W
Welders (45%)
L
Coleraine (60%)
W
Bangor (49%)
W
Ballymena Utd (55%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ballymena Utd H
1 - 1 D
51%
Crusaders A
0 - 2 L
56%
Doncaster H
0 - 5 L
48%
Carrick H
2 - 3 L
56%
Crusaders H
0 - 1 L
50%
Bangor A
0 - 0 D
49%
Ballymena Utd A
1 - 1 D
55%
Portadown H
1 - 1 D
42%
Larne H
0 - 3 L
47%
Crusaders A
3 - 0 W
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Crusaders A
2 - 3 L
55%
Dungannon H
0 - 1 L
55%
Carrick A
0 - 1 L
61%
Kilbarrack Utd A
3 - 0 W
43%
Welders A
2 - 0 W
45%
Coleraine A
0 - 3 L
60%
Bangor A
4 - 2 W
49%
Ballymena Utd A
2 - 1 W
55%
Crusaders A
0 - 4 L
55%
Carrick H
1 - 1 D
56%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 47.7 vs 49.2), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Portadown holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Glenavon's 0.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Glenavon conceding 1.7 and Portadown conceding 1.6 per match.

Glenavon has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Portadown has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.8 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Glenavon is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Portadown is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Glenavon shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Portadown faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.6 goals per match. If Glenavon can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 10.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 76% win probability for Portadown. In practical terms, Portadown would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Portadown has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.6-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the Irish Premiership (2026-04-04). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Glenavon

Glenavon

VS
Portadown

Portadown

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Glenavon

1W 4D 5L · 8 goals scored · 17 conceded

Portadown

4W 1D 5L · 14 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or