Glentoran vs RFS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Glentoran vs RFS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Glentoran
Home Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Glentoran
Draw
RFS
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
3W, 1D, 2L
16 / 10 matches
10 / 6 matches
14 / 10 matches
7 / 6 matches
+2
+3
4 / 10 matches
1 / 6 matches
5 / 10 matches
3 / 6 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 6 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 3 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 3 matches
League Difficulty: 49.2, Opponent Quality: 56.4
League Difficulty: 78.0, Opponent Quality: 67.0
0W / 2 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.1
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.24
Attack: 47.7, Defense: 47.7, Form: 35.8
Attack: 59.3, Defense: 62.8, Form: 52.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Glentoran
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
RFS has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 54.7 against considerably stronger competition than Glentoran (SoS: 39.4). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Glentoran (1.6 goals per match) and RFS (1.7 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
Both defenses are comparable, with Glentoran conceding 1.4 and RFS conceding 1.2 per match.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, RFS faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Glentoran can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 12.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 80% win probability for RFS. In practical terms, RFS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
While RFS holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 12.0-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-16), RFS came out on top with a 2-0 victory over Glentoran. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. RFS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Glentoran will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. RFS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-09), RFS came out on top with a 1-2 victory over Glentoran. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Notably, RFS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Glentoran shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Glentoran will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. RFS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Glentoran
RFS
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Glentoran
4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 14 conceded
RFS
3W 1D 2L · 10 goals scored · 7 conceded
Popular Teams