Gnistan vs Jaro Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Gnistan vs Jaro: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Gnistan
Home Team
Jaro
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Gnistan
Draw
Jaro
Statistical Comparison
5W, 3D, 2L
2W, 2D, 6L
18 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
+5
-12
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
2W / 4 matches
2W / 6 matches
3W / 6 matches
0W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.8
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.03
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.12
Attack: 57.7, Defense: 54.5, Form: 48.1
Attack: 26.2, Defense: 32.7, Form: 19.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Gnistan
Jaro
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 46.1 vs 48.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Few sides can match Gnistan in front of goal. Their 1.8 average per fixture tells the story, with A. Akinyemi driving that output personally responsible for 8 goals this campaign.
Defensively, Gnistan holds the advantage — allowing just 1.3 goals per game against Jaro's 2.0.
Gnistan has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Gnistan has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Jaro is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Gnistan is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Jaro shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Gnistan faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Jaro can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 22.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Gnistan. In practical terms, Gnistan would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Gnistan in this contest. Their superior power rating of 53.3, compared to 30.8 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the Finnish Veikkausliiga (2026-06-23). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Gnistan
Jaro
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Gnistan
5W 3D 2L · 18 goals scored · 13 conceded
Jaro
2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 20 conceded
Popular Teams