Skip to content
Compare Gnistan vs Jaro

Gnistan vs Jaro Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gnistan vs Jaro: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gnistan Gnistan Home Team
Jaro Jaro Away Team
Gnistan
53.3
W W D L W W W L D D

Last 10 Matches

Jaro
30.8
L L L L W D W L D L

Performance Radar

Gnistan
Jaro

Categories Won

10

Gnistan

3

Draw

2

Jaro

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

-12

-12

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Akinyemi (8 goals)
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.8

48.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.77

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.03

0.68

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
53.3

Attack: 57.7, Defense: 54.5, Form: 48.1

30.8

Attack: 26.2, Defense: 32.7, Form: 19.6

Goal Timing Analysis

5

0-15'

2

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

Gnistan
Jaro
Gnistan

Power Rating Breakdown

53.3

Overall

Attack 57.7
Defense 54.5
Form 48.1
Consistency 53.2
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

30.8

Overall

Attack 26.2
Defense 32.7
Form 19.6
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.8 vs 50.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gnistan logo Gnistan
W
HJK (60%)
W
Ilves (44%)
D
SJK (44%)
L
KuPS (43%)
W
Inter Turku (58%)
W
Oulu (43%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
L
Lahti (59%)
Jaro logo Jaro
L
Oulu (38%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
VPS (50%)
L
Lahti (59%)
W
SJK (40%)
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
Ilves (44%)
L
TPS (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
HJK A
3 - 2 W
60%
Ilves H
3 - 2 W
44%
SJK A
2 - 2 D
44%
KuPS H
0 - 1 L
43%
Inter Turku A
2 - 1 W
58%
Oulu A
2 - 0 W
43%
Mariehamn H
4 - 2 W
29%
Lahti A
0 - 1 L
59%
VPS H
1 - 1 D
50%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oulu H
0 - 1 L
38%
HJK A
0 - 3 L
60%
VPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Lahti A
0 - 2 L
59%
SJK H
2 - 1 W
40%
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
44%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
54%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
54%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
49%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 46.1 vs 48.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Few sides can match Gnistan in front of goal. Their 1.8 average per fixture tells the story, with A. Akinyemi driving that output personally responsible for 8 goals this campaign.

Defensively, Gnistan holds the advantage — allowing just 1.3 goals per game against Jaro's 2.0.

Gnistan has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Gnistan has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Jaro is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Gnistan is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Jaro shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Gnistan faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Jaro can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 22.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Gnistan. In practical terms, Gnistan would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Gnistan in this contest. Their superior power rating of 53.3, compared to 30.8 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the Finnish Veikkausliiga (2026-06-23). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gnistan

Gnistan

VS
Jaro

Jaro

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Gnistan

5W 3D 2L · 18 goals scored · 13 conceded

Jaro

2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or