Go Ahead vs Heracles Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Go Ahead vs Heracles: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Go Ahead
Home Team
Heracles
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Go Ahead
Draw
Heracles
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
0W, 2D, 8L
20 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
23 / 10 matches
+6
-19
5 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
3W / 6 matches
0W / 6 matches
0W / 4 matches
0W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 59.2
League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 64.7
0W / 3 matches
0W / 4 matches
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.02
Actual: 0.4 | Diff: +0.04
Attack: 67.5, Defense: 54.0, Form: 30.4
Attack: 13.9, Defense: 24.4, Form: 0.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Go Ahead
Heracles
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 51.3 vs 54.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Go Ahead's attack is on another level, averaging 2.0 goals per match with J. Breum leading the charge (4 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.
The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Go Ahead — 1.4 goals conceded per game and 5 clean sheets put them well ahead of Heracles, who give up 2.3 goals per match at the other end.
Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Heracles has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Heracles is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Go Ahead is on the rise with 3W in last 10, while Heracles shows signs of decline with 0W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Go Ahead faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Heracles can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 26.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Go Ahead. In practical terms, Go Ahead would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Go Ahead in this contest. Their superior power rating of 50.9, compared to 24.6 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Go Ahead
Heracles
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Go Ahead
3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 14 conceded
Heracles
0W 2D 8L · 4 goals scored · 23 conceded
Popular Teams