Go Ahead vs OFI Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Go Ahead vs OFI: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Go Ahead
Home Team
OFI
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Go Ahead
Draw
OFI
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
3W, 2D, 5L
20 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
+6
-6
5 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 6 matches
2W / 4 matches
0W / 4 matches
1W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 59.2
League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 49.6
0W / 3 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.02
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.02
Attack: 67.5, Defense: 54.0, Form: 30.4
Attack: 40.7, Defense: 40.7, Form: 30.5
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Go Ahead
OFI
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.3 vs 51.7), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Offensively, Go Ahead outperforms OFI with 2.0 goals per match to 1.2, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Go Ahead's backline outperforms OFI's, with 1.4 goals conceded per match versus 1.8.
Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
OFI has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Go Ahead faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If OFI can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 12.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 80% win probability for Go Ahead. In practical terms, Go Ahead would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Go Ahead has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-25), Go Ahead prevailed 4-0 against OFI. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Go Ahead secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 4-0 scoreline was emphatic — Go Ahead completely dominated OFI in that encounter, raising serious questions about OFI's ability to compete at this level. OFI will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Go Ahead will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Go Ahead
OFI
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Go Ahead
3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 14 conceded
OFI
3W 2D 5L · 12 goals scored · 18 conceded
Popular Teams