Go Ahead vs Telstar Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Go Ahead vs Telstar: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Go Ahead
Home Team
Telstar
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Go Ahead
Draw
Telstar
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
6W, 1D, 3L
20 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
+6
+7
5 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3W / 6 matches
4W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 59.2
League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 58.3
0W / 3 matches
1W / 3 matches
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.02
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: -0.27
Attack: 67.5, Defense: 54.0, Form: 30.4
Attack: 77.5, Defense: 59.0, Form: 66.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Go Ahead
Telstar
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (51.3 vs 60.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Go Ahead averaging 2.0 and Telstar averaging 2.1 goals per match.
Both defenses are comparable, with Go Ahead conceding 1.4 and Telstar conceding 1.4 per match.
Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Telstar has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Telstar has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
📈 Form Momentum: Telstar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Telstar is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Go Ahead shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Telstar faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Go Ahead can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 13.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 84% win probability for Telstar. In practical terms, Telstar would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Telstar, with a 13.5-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Go Ahead
Telstar
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Go Ahead
3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 14 conceded
Telstar
6W 1D 3L · 21 goals scored · 14 conceded
Popular Teams