Groningen vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Groningen vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Groningen
Home Team
Go Ahead
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Groningen
Draw
Go Ahead
Statistical Comparison
3W, 2D, 5L
3W, 3D, 4L
10 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
-6
+6
3 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
1W / 6 matches
3W / 6 matches
2W / 4 matches
0W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 69.5, Opponent Quality: 59.9
League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 59.2
2W / 4 matches
0W / 3 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.12
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.02
Attack: 37.1, Defense: 51.9, Form: 33.4
Attack: 67.5, Defense: 54.0, Form: 30.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Groningen
Go Ahead
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 61.3 vs 51.3), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Few sides can match Go Ahead in front of goal. Their 2.0 average per fixture tells the story, with J. Breum driving that output personally responsible for 4 goals this campaign.
Both defenses are comparable, with Groningen conceding 1.6 and Go Ahead conceding 1.4 per match.
Groningen has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.
Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Go Ahead faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Groningen can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 9.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 74% win probability for Go Ahead. In practical terms, Go Ahead would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
Go Ahead has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.4-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
These two teams drew 0-0 in the Dutch Eredivisie (2026-04-11). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Groningen
Go Ahead
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Groningen
3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 16 conceded
Go Ahead
3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 14 conceded
Popular Teams