Skip to content
Compare HamKam vs Brann

HamKam vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare HamKam vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

HamKam HamKam Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
HamKam
34.1
L D W L L L D D W L

Last 10 Matches

Brann
62.4
D W W L W W L D W W

Performance Radar

HamKam
Brann

Categories Won

1

HamKam

1

Draw

13

Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Potur (4 goals)
N. Castro (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
14%

1W / 7 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
38.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 53.6

52.3

League Difficulty: 64.0, Opponent Quality: 58.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.98

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.22

2.46

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.26

Adjusted Power Rating
34.1

Attack: 35.5, Defense: 35.5, Form: 17.8

62.4

Attack: 75.0, Defense: 54.6, Form: 61.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

5
4

76-90+'

7
HamKam
Brann
HamKam

Power Rating Breakdown

34.1

Overall

Attack 35.5
Defense 35.5
Form 17.8
Consistency 61.3
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

62.4

Overall

Attack 75.0
Defense 54.6
Form 61.4
Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 64.0

Opponent Quality

53.6 vs 58.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 25%
HamKam logo HamKam
L
Brann (64%)
D
Aalesund (44%)
W
Vålerenga (50%)
L
Sarpsborg (57%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (75%)
L
Tromsø (58%)
D
Sandefjord (43%)
D
Aalesund (50%)
Brann logo Brann
D
PAOK (71%)
W
HamKam (40%)
W
Apollon (77%)
L
Apollon (75%)
W
Rosenborg (51%)
W
U Cluj (68%)
L
Vålerenga (45%)
D
U Cluj (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brann A
0 - 3 L
64%
Aalesund H
1 - 1 D
44%
Vålerenga A
3 - 0 W
50%
Sarpsborg A
0 - 1 L
57%
Bodø/Glimt A
0 - 3 L
75%
Tromsø H
1 - 4 L
58%
Sandefjord A
2 - 2 D
43%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Lillestrøm H
2 - 0 W
42%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 2 L
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PAOK A
1 - 1 D
71%
HamKam H
3 - 0 W
40%
Apollon A
4 - 2 W
77%
Apollon H
0 - 1 L
75%
Rosenborg H
3 - 2 W
51%
U Cluj H
3 - 1 W
68%
Vålerenga H
2 - 3 L
45%
U Cluj A
2 - 2 D
70%
Molde A
2 - 1 W
53%
Start H
2 - 1 W
33%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

Brann has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 52.3) compared to HamKam (SoS: 38.8). This means Brann's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.

Brann possess a formidable attacking unit, with N. Castro accounting for 5 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.2 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Brann's backline outperforms HamKam's, with 1.4 goals conceded per match versus 1.8.

Brann has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.3 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: HamKam is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Brann has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Brann is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while HamKam shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Brann faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If HamKam can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 28.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Brann. In practical terms, Brann would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Brann holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 62.4 against 34.1 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent Norwegian Eliteserien match (2026-08-16), Brann prevailed 3-0 against HamKam. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Brann secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Brann completely dominated HamKam in that encounter, raising serious questions about HamKam's ability to compete at this level. HamKam will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Brann will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

HamKam

HamKam

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

HamKam

2W 3D 5L · 12 goals scored · 18 conceded

Brann

6W 2D 2L · 22 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or