Skip to content
Compare Hearts vs Cumbernauld C.

Hearts vs Cumbernauld C. Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hearts vs Cumbernauld C.: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hearts Hearts Home Team
Cumbernauld C. Cumbernauld C. Away Team
Hearts
26.0
L W L L L D L L W W

Last 10 Matches

Cumbernauld C.
59.9
W L W W D W W L W W

Performance Radar

Hearts
Cumbernauld C.

Categories Won

1

Hearts

2

Draw

12

Cumbernauld C.

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

70%

7W, 1D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

3.1

31 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.6

26 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

+17

+17

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

100%

10 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
O. Muirhead (3 goals)
T. Horn (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 19
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.4

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 42.4

30.7

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 34.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.8

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.2

2.33

Actual: 3.1 | Diff: +0.77

Adjusted Power Rating
26.0

Attack: 28.5, Defense: 11.4, Form: 25.6

59.9

Attack: 80.7, Defense: 43.0, Form: 56.5

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

6
5

46-60'

7
1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

11
Hearts
Cumbernauld C.
Hearts

Power Rating Breakdown

26.0

Overall

Attack 28.5
Defense 11.4
Form 25.6
Consistency 46.0
Cumbernauld C.

Power Rating Breakdown

59.9

Overall

Attack 80.7
Defense 43.0
Form 56.5
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

42.4 vs 34.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hearts logo Hearts
L
Cowdenbeath (36%)
W
Albion (44%)
L
East Stirling (32%)
L
Clydebank (58%)
L
Bonnyrigg RA (46%)
D
Gretna (29%)
L
Cumbernauld C. (60%)
L
Broxburn Ath. (26%)
Cumbernauld C. logo Cumbernauld C.
W
Stirling Unv (22%)
L
Bo'ness Utd (30%)
W
Gretna (29%)
W
Berwick (52%)
D
Broxburn Ath. (31%)
W
Strollers (31%)
W
Fairydean (32%)
L
Tranent (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cowdenbeath A
0 - 3 L
36%
Albion H
3 - 0 W
44%
East Stirling A
2 - 4 L
32%
Clydebank H
0 - 8 L
58%
Bonnyrigg RA A
0 - 4 L
46%
Gretna H
1 - 1 D
29%
Cumbernauld C. A
0 - 3 L
60%
Broxburn Ath. H
0 - 1 L
26%
Bo'ness Utd H
2 - 1 W
26%
Linlithgow A
2 - 1 W
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Stirling Unv H
4 - 1 W
22%
Bo'ness Utd A
2 - 3 L
30%
Gretna H
3 - 1 W
29%
Berwick A
3 - 2 W
52%
Broxburn Ath. A
3 - 3 D
31%
Strollers A
5 - 0 W
31%
Fairydean A
3 - 2 W
32%
Tranent H
1 - 2 L
50%
Hearts H
3 - 0 W
24%
Albion H
4 - 0 W
44%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 35.4 vs 30.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Cumbernauld C.'s attack is on another level, averaging 3.1 goals per match with T. Horn leading the charge with 7 goals. Hearts manages just 1.0 per match.

Defensively, Cumbernauld C. is far superior, conceding just 1.4 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Hearts leaks 2.6 per match.

Hearts has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cumbernauld C. has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Cumbernauld C., who boasts a 80% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Cumbernauld C. is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Cumbernauld C. is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (80.7), defense (43.0), and form (56.5) leaves little room for doubt. Hearts will need an exceptional performance to compete.

In their recent Highland / Lowland match (2026-02-27), Cumbernauld C. prevailed 3-0 against Hearts. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Cumbernauld C. secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Cumbernauld C. completely dominated Hearts in that encounter, raising serious questions about Hearts's ability to compete at this level. Hearts will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Cumbernauld C. will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hearts

Hearts

VS
Cumbernauld C.

Cumbernauld C.

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Hearts

3W 1D 6L · 10 goals scored · 26 conceded

Cumbernauld C.

7W 1D 2L · 31 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or