Skip to content
Compare Hearts vs Cumbernauld C.

Hearts vs Cumbernauld C. Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hearts vs Cumbernauld C.: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hearts Hearts Home Team
Cumbernauld C. Cumbernauld C. Away Team
Hearts
26.2
W L W L L L D L L W

Last 10 Matches

Cumbernauld C.
38.4
D D L L D W L W W D

Performance Radar

Hearts
Cumbernauld C.

Categories Won

3

Hearts

3

Draw

9

Cumbernauld C.

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.8

28 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

0

0

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Wilson (2 goals)
J. Jack (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.0

League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 40.4

29.0

League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 30.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.1

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.1

1.48

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: +0.72

Adjusted Power Rating
26.2

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 5.7, Form: 25.5

38.4

Attack: 57.9, Defense: 21.1, Form: 23.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

7
5

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

7
Hearts
Cumbernauld C.
Hearts

Power Rating Breakdown

26.2

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 5.7
Form 25.5
Consistency 46.0
Cumbernauld C.

Power Rating Breakdown

38.4

Overall

Attack 57.9
Defense 21.1
Form 23.7
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

27.0 vs 27.0

Opponent Quality

40.4 vs 30.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hearts logo Hearts
W
Berwick (48%)
L
Cowdenbeath (39%)
W
Albion (41%)
L
East Stirling (35%)
L
Clydebank (58%)
L
Bonnyrigg RA (52%)
D
Gretna (17%)
L
Cumbernauld C. (43%)
Cumbernauld C. logo Cumbernauld C.
D
Dalbeattie (21%)
D
Gretna (22%)
L
QOTS (43%)
L
Auchinleck (45%)
D
Renfrew (22%)
W
Stirling Unv (12%)
L
Bo'ness Utd (43%)
W
Gretna (17%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Berwick A
4 - 3 W
48%
Cowdenbeath A
0 - 3 L
39%
Albion H
3 - 0 W
41%
East Stirling A
2 - 4 L
35%
Clydebank H
0 - 8 L
58%
Bonnyrigg RA A
0 - 4 L
52%
Gretna H
1 - 1 D
17%
Cumbernauld C. A
0 - 3 L
43%
Broxburn Ath. H
0 - 1 L
33%
Bo'ness Utd H
2 - 1 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dalbeattie H
2 - 2 D
21%
Gretna A
3 - 3 D
22%
QOTS A
0 - 4 L
43%
Auchinleck A
0 - 1 L
45%
Renfrew H
2 - 2 D
22%
Stirling Unv H
4 - 1 W
12%
Bo'ness Utd A
2 - 3 L
43%
Gretna H
3 - 1 W
17%
Berwick A
3 - 2 W
40%
Broxburn Ath. A
3 - 3 D
38%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (35.0 vs 29.0), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Few sides can match Cumbernauld C. in front of goal. Their 2.2 average per fixture tells the story, with J. Jack driving that output personally responsible for 5 goals this campaign.

Cumbernauld C.'s backline outperforms Hearts's, with 2.2 goals conceded per match versus 2.8.

Hearts has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cumbernauld C. has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Cumbernauld C. faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.2 goals per match. If Hearts can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 12.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 80% win probability for Cumbernauld C.. In practical terms, Cumbernauld C. would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Cumbernauld C. holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 12.2-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent Highland / Lowland match (2026-02-27), Cumbernauld C. prevailed 3-0 against Hearts. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Cumbernauld C. secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Cumbernauld C. completely dominated Hearts in that encounter, raising serious questions about Hearts's ability to compete at this level. Hearts will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Cumbernauld C. will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hearts

Hearts

VS
Cumbernauld C.

Cumbernauld C.

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Hearts

3W 1D 6L · 12 goals scored · 28 conceded

Cumbernauld C.

3W 4D 3L · 22 goals scored · 22 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or